Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39802198›Full record

ArticleTransplantation direct2025

Clinical Outcomes and Donor-specific Antibody Rebound 5 y After Kidney Transplant Enabled by Imlifidase Desensitization.

Ian S Jaffe, Anna Runström, Vasishta S Tatapudi, Elaina P Weldon, Cecilia L Deterville, Rebecca A Dieter, Robert A Montgomery, Bonnie E Lonze, Massimo Mangiola

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transplantation direct, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02790437 (A Phase II Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of IdeS), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02790437 phase2completednot on this map

A Phase II Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of IdeS (IgG Endopeptidase) to Desensitize Transplant Patients With a Positive Crossmatch Test

TypeinterventionalSponsorHansa Biopharma ABRan2016 to 2018Enrolled19ConditionsKidney Failure, ChronicArmsIdeS, Kidney transplantation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ian S JaffeDepartment of Surgery, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7309-308X
Anna RunströmHansa Biopharma, Lund, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9139-0283
Vasishta S TatapudiNew York University Langone Transplant Institute, New York, NY.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2717-3628
Elaina P WeldonDepartment of Surgery, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-4394-8528
Cecilia L DetervilleDepartment of Surgery, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY.
Rebecca A DieterDepartment of Surgery, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7906-1372
Robert A MontgomeryDepartment of Surgery, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2728-4552
Bonnie E LonzeDepartment of Surgery, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0973-1657
Massimo MangiolaNew York University Langone Transplant Institute, New York, NY.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5406-4005

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Imlifidase is an IgG-cleaving endopeptidase conditionally approved in Europe for desensitization of highly sensitized patients before kidney transplantation. We present 5-y outcomes and donor-specific antibody (DSA) levels for clinical trial participants from a single site who received imlifidase for desensitization before incompatible transplantation (NCT02790437). Methods: Imlifidase was administered up to 24 h before living or deceased donor kidney transplantation. DSAs were monitored before transplantation, at days 7 and 28, and at 5 y posttransplant. Results: At 5 y, 7 of 8 participants were alive. One of these 7 had suboptimal graft function secondary to donor-derived disease but remained dialysis independent. Three participants had antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), which occurred in the first 30 d in all cases and was successfully treated. No new episodes of suspected or biopsy-proven AMR occurred after 30 d posttransplant. Seven participants had DSA rebound. DSAs commonly persisted 5 y posttransplant, although they were generally lower strength compared with pre-imlifidase. Dilution studies of sensitized serum enabled the identification of lower AMR risk phenotypes for persisting DSAs. Severe and/or opportunistic infections were not observed at greater than expected frequency. Conclusions: Five-year outcomes of imlifidase-enabled incompatible transplants are overall favorable. DSA rebound is common, but antibody strength lessens in the long term, and longitudinally persisting DSAs did not lead to premature graft failure.

Identifiers

PMID39802198
PMCPMC11723687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.