Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39802193›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2025

The feasibility of virtual reality therapy for upper extremity mobilization during and after intensive care unit admission.

Mirthe de Vries, Lise F E Beumeler, Johan van der Meulen, Carina Bethlehem, Rob den Otter, E Christiaan Boerma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mirthe de Vries *Department of Intensive Care, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, Netherlands.
Lise F E Beumeler *Department of Intensive Care, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, Netherlands.
Johan van der Meulen8D Games, Leeuwarden, Netherlands.
Carina BethlehemDepartment of Intensive Care, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, Netherlands.
Rob den OtterDepartment of Human Movement Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
E Christiaan BoermaDepartment of Intensive Care, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Early mobilization reduces long-term muscle weakness after intensive care unit (ICU) admission, but barriers (e.g., anxiety, lack of motivation) may complicate patients' adherence to exercise. Virtual reality (VR) presents immersive stimuli, which may increase motivation and adherence. This study aimed to examine the feasibility of VR-therapy using a VR-headset during ICU- and subsequent general ward admission. Furthermore, physical parameters before and after training were explored. Materials & Methods: Ten adult ICU-patients with a median age of 71 [63-79], 70% of male registered birth sex, mechanically ventilated for ≥48 h, and willing to participate, were included. VR-therapy was offered three times a week for 20 minutes in addition to standard care. To train upper extremity functionality, patients were instructed to complete puzzles with increasing level of difficulty. Feasibility was based on patient satisfaction, session efficiency, and adherence levels during the training. Fatigue was measured after each session using the Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion Scale. Patients' hand-grip strength and Morton Mobility Index (MMI) were evaluated at the start of VR-therapy and after four weeks of training or at hospital discharge. Results: On average, patients followed three VR-therapy sessions of 20 min per week with 13 min of actual training time, over the course of 1 to 3 weeks depending on their length of stay. Session efficiency ranged from 25% to 93%. In total, patients adhered to 60% of the VR-therapy sessions. MMI scores increased significantly from the start (26 [24-44]) to the end of the VR-therapy training period (57 [41-85], Conclusion: VR-therapy for upper extremity rehabilitation in ICU-patients is feasible during stay in the ICU and general ward.

Indexed as

Early AmbulationIntensive Care UnitsMuscle WeaknessUpper ExtremityVirtual RealityVirtual Reality Exposure TherapyAgedFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient CompliancePatient SatisfactionCritical illnessMobilizationRehabilitationVirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID39802193
PMCPMC11725268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.