ArticlePeerJ2025
Efficacy of root canal treatment for autotransplanted third molars: a 6-Year cohort study of 167 teeth in southern China.
Article in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Impact of root canal treatment timing on the prognosis of autotransplanted teeth with complete root formation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC oral health · 2026Pooled it
- Effect of Apical Micro-Intervention on Pulp Vitality and Periodontal Regeneration Following Tooth Autotransplantation: A Clinical Outcome Study.International dental journal · 2026Article
- Clinical outcomes of tooth autotransplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of survival.Restorative dentistry & endodontics · 2026Article
- Autogenous Transplantation of Teeth Across Clinical Indications: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Autogenous tooth transplantation offers significant advantages and promising success rates for replacing non-retainable teeth. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic factors, especially the impact of root canal treatment (RCT), of autotransplanted teeth in an up-to-6-year follow-up cohort of 167 teeth in Southern China. Methods: We enrolled adult patients from the Southern Medical University-Shenzhen Stomatology Hospital between 2017 and 2023. Patients underwent autogenous tooth transplantation to replace non-retainable molars with upper or lower third molars with Moorrees tooth development stage ≥5. All surgical procedures were performed by an experienced surgeon. The included patients were followed up for 6~72 (median 28.5) months. Success, failure, and survival rate and prognostic factors were evaluated using univariable Kaplan-Meier, multivariable generalized linear regression, and multivariable COX regression analyses. Results: The overall success rate is 97.6% with four unsuccessful cases. Herein, two of them were removed, leading to an overall survival rate of 98.8%. A total of 159 cases (95%) received RCT in 3 months. Univariable log-rank analysis showed that RCT (RR 0.109, 95%CI 0.010 to 1.202,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.