ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention2025
Measuring health-related quality of life in cardiovascular disease using a novel patient-centred and disease-specific patient-reported outcome measure.
Article in International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Assessment of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) is impaired by limitations of current patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). We developed the first cardiovascular disease (CVD) specific electronic PROM for which health items were derived by a fully patient-centered method. This paper reports on the measurement of HRQoL in CVD patients by a novel developed electronic patient-centred PROM based on a preference-based measurement model. Methods and results: In an earlier patient-based study nine health items were selected as most important to CVD patients. These items were assessed in the novel preference-based PROM of this study. CVD patients registered with a Dutch patient organization were asked to rate their health state. We compared HRQoL between subgroups of age, gender and CVD. A total of 554 patients participated in this study. The patient reported health items "worry", "self-reliance" and "sexuality" had the highest impact on HRQoL of CVD patients. Median HRQoL was better for men compared to woman (-17.04, IQR: 31.47 to -3.91 vs. -25.22; IQR: 42.06 to -9.53, p = 0.003). Best and worst HRQoL were observed in patients with an unknown or other CVD disease (-15.61, IQR: 28.52 to -3.91) followed by individuals with coronary artery disease (-16.99, IQR: 38.08 - 0.00) and heart failure (-24.27, IQR: 42.64 to -12.98). Conclusions: This novel patient-centred, preference-based, CVD-specific PROM accurately measures HRQoL by taking individual health preferences into account and tackling limitations of current PROMs. This PROM is therefore promising to evaluate interventions and optimize personalized therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.