ArticleCirculation reports2025
Real-World Long-Term Effectiveness of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators in Elderly Patients.
Article in Circulation reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cost-Effectiveness of Atrioventricular Synchronous Leadless Pacing in Patients With Atrioventricular Block: Results and Implications From an Exploratory Analysis for Japan.Circulation reports · 2026Article
- Self-Reported Sleep Quality and Circadian Rest-Activity Patterns in Patients With Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices.Circulation reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Because it is unclear whether implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are equally effective in patients of all ages, we investigated the association of age with long-term clinical outcomes of patients who underwent ICD implantation. Methods and Results: A total of 416 consecutive patients (mean age: 69 years) from 4 tertiary hospitals who underwent ICD implantation or were upgraded from an existing permanent pacemaker between January 2011 and November 2022 were enrolled and divided into 3 groups based on age: <65 years (n=158), 65-74 years (n=138), and ≥75 years (n=120). We compared the incidence of all-cause death and adverse cardiovascular events, including cardiac death, appropriate ICD therapy, and heart failure hospitalization. During a median follow-up period of 3.2 years (interquartile range: 1.1-5.6 years), 120 patients died. Older patients had a higher cumulative incidence of all-cause death and composite adverse cardiovascular events. The cumulative incidence of cardiac death and appropriate ICD therapies did not differ significantly; however, the incidence of hospitalization for heart failure increased with age. In multivariate analysis, age was independently associated with all-cause death but not composite adverse outcomes. Conclusions: Age had a significant effect on subsequent all-cause death, but not on adverse cardiovascular events in patients with ICDs, suggesting that age should not be the only indication considered for ICD implantation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.