Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39802107›Full record

ArticleEndoscopic ultrasound

Deep learning segmentation architectures for automatic detection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy samples based on whole-slide imaging.

Anca Loredana Udriștoiu, Nicoleta Podină, Bogdan Silviu Ungureanu, Alina Constantin, Claudia Valentina Georgescu, Nona Bejinariu, Daniel Pirici, Daniela Elena Burtea, Lucian Gruionu, Stefan Udriștoiu and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endoscopic ultrasound. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Anca Loredana UdriștoiuFaculty of Automation, Computers and Electronics, University of Craiova, Craiova, Romania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5560-6435
Nicoleta PodinăDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ponderas Academic Hospital, Bucharest, Romania.
Bogdan Silviu UngureanuDepartment of Gastroenterology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Craiova, Romania.
Alina ConstantinDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ponderas Academic Hospital, Bucharest, Romania.
Claudia Valentina GeorgescuDepartment of Pathology, Clinical Emergency County Hospital of Craiova, Craiova, Romania.
Nona BejinariuREGINA MARIA Regional Laboratory, Pathological Anatomy Division, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Daniel PiriciDepartment of Histology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Craiova, Romania.
Daniela Elena BurteaResearch Center of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Craiova, Craiova, Romania.
Lucian GruionuFaculty of Mechanics, University of Craiova, Craiova, Romania.
Stefan UdriștoiuFaculty of Automation, Computers and Electronics, University of Craiova, Craiova, Romania.
Adrian SăftoiuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ponderas Academic Hospital, Bucharest, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy is the procedure of choice for the diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Nevertheless, the samples obtained are small and require expertise in pathology, whereas the diagnosis is difficult in view of the scarcity of malignant cells and the important desmoplastic reaction of these tumors. With the help of artificial intelligence, the deep learning architectures produce a fast, accurate, and automated approach for PDAC image segmentation based on whole-slide imaging. Given the effectiveness of U-Net in semantic segmentation, numerous variants and improvements have emerged, specifically for whole-slide imaging segmentation. Methods: In this study, a comparison of 7 U-Net architecture variants was performed on 2 different datasets of EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy samples from 2 medical centers (31 and 33 whole-slide images, respectively) with different parameters and acquisition tools. The U-Net architecture variants evaluated included some that had not been previously explored for PDAC whole-slide image segmentation. The evaluation of their performance involved calculating accuracy through the mean Dice coefficient and mean intersection over union (IoU). Results: The highest segmentation accuracies were obtained using Inception U-Net architecture for both datasets. PDAC tissue was segmented with the overall average Dice coefficient of 97.82% and IoU of 0.87 for Dataset 1, respectively, overall average Dice coefficient of 95.70%, and IoU of 0.79 for Dataset 2. Also, we considered the external testing of the trained segmentation models by performing the cross evaluations between the 2 datasets. The Inception U-Net model trained on Train Dataset 1 performed with the overall average Dice coefficient of 93.12% and IoU of 0.74 on Test Dataset 2. The Inception U-Net model trained on Train Dataset 2 performed with the overall average Dice coefficient of 92.09% and IoU of 0.81 on Test Dataset 1. Conclusions: The findings of this study demonstrated the feasibility of utilizing artificial intelligence for assessing PDAC segmentation in whole-slide imaging, supported by promising scores.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceDeep learningEUS-guided fine-needle biopsyPancreatic ductal adenocarcinomaWhole-slide imaging

Identifiers

PMID39802107
PMCPMC11723688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.