ArticleGynecologic oncology reports2025
Provider perspectives on caring for patients with limited English proficiency-a national survey of the Society of Gynecologic Oncology.
Article in Gynecologic oncology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In diversity, equity and inclusion research, overcoming barriers in language discordant patient care is one of the largest and most challenging gaps. It is well established that patients with limited English proficiency (LEP) have higher rates of misdiagnosis, medical errors, and serious adverse events, and recommended best practices for LEP patient care are often not followed. Objective: Our team sought to elicit provider perspectives regarding the barriers they face in caring for LEP patients-especially the unique challenges faced when caring for patients with complex and sensitive diagnoses such as gynecologic cancer. Methods: A national survey was conducted through the Society of Gynecologic Oncology survey database during November and December of 2023. The survey included questions regarding the landscape of LEP patient care in varied geographic settings and practice types. It queried providers regarding available support and resources, as well as tools practitioners would recommend to improve care for LEP patients with gynecologic cancer. The results were assessed using descriptive statistics and Likert Scales and analyzed using t-tests, Fisher's Exact test, Chi-square analysis and ANOVA. Results: 188 respondents completed the survey. Spanish was the most spoken non-English language in providers' patient populations; however, 39 different languages were reported as commonly spoken. Providers reported increases in stress and a lack of time in caring for LEP patients. When asked what interventions providers would recommend to improve LEP patient care, providers asked for more in-person interpreters (40%), more written patient instructions in needed languages (32%), and more time (17%). Conclusions: Understanding barriers to best practices in LEP patient care is vital to planning future interventions. While this survey was limited by the small percentage of respondents, it provides foundational information for future interventions intended to relieve over-burdened practitioners and systems and achieve the ultimate goal of improved outcomes for LEP patients.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.