Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39802016›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2025

No impact of story context and avatar power on performance in a stop-signal game.

Linus Held, Johannes Pannermayr, Alina Kaufmann, Marouscha Scheffer, Paola Flores, Martin Dechant, Maximilian A Friehs

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Linus HeldUniversity of Twente, Netherlands.
Johannes PannermayrUniversity of Twente, Netherlands.
Alina KaufmannUniversity of Twente, Netherlands.
Marouscha SchefferUniversity of Twente, Netherlands.
Paola FloresUniversity of Twente, Netherlands.
Martin DechantUniversity College London, United Kingdom.
Maximilian A FriehsUniversity of Twente, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of gamification on response inhibition in a Stop-Signal Task (SST) and examines participants' gamification experience. The findings reveal that, after accounting for approach- and avoidance-motivation as well as impulsiveness, higher immersion is associated with impaired response inhibition. This effect could be attributed to a substantial decline in immersion between the first and second SST sessions. Despite intrinsic motivation and avatar identification not significantly predicting performance, both factors exhibited a decline across sessions, suggesting an overall diminished gaming experience in the second session. Alternatively, motivational variables as immersion and avatar identification might be detrimental to response inhibition, by shifting attention away from relevant task elements. Contrary to expectations, approach and avoidance narratives did not influence outcome variables or participant experience, while different avatars led to altered avatar identification, particularly favouring strong avatars. The declining motivation over time might stem from a lack of tangible goals within the gamified task, where narrative elements alone failed to induce sufficient goal-oriented motivation. These findings underscore the nuanced interplay between gamification elements, task complexity, and participants' expectations, emphasizing the need for carefully tailored gamification strategies in experimental designs.

Indexed as

GamificationInhibitionMotivationStop-signal game

Identifiers

PMID39802016
PMCPMC11719363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.