ArticleHeliyon2025
Dye sensitized solar cells: Meta-analysis of effect sensitizer-type on photovoltaic efficiency.
Article in Heliyon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- (TD)DFT investigation of donor influence on the electronic and photovoltaic properties of D-π-A-π-A quinoxaline dyes.Journal of molecular modeling · 2026Article
- Phenothiazine: A Promising Core for Perovskite and Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Push-pull heterocycles and beyond: recent developments in absorption, emission, and ICT properties.RSC advances · 2025Review
- Molecular engineering and electrolyte optimization strategies for enhanced performance of Ru(ii) polypyridyl-sensitized DSSCs.RSC advances · 2025Review
- The Adsorption of Ru-Based Dyes on the TiOMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells (DSSCs) was created, a versatile and cost-effective alternative among photovoltaic technology options for power generation and energy transition to combat climate change have emerged. The theoretical and experimental knowledge of DSSCs have increased in regard to their operation in the last three decades of development; it includes the device's components, as well as the most recent innovations in their application and forms of activation. In this work paper, we presented a meta-study of photovoltaic characterization parameters, 329 scientific reports of DSSCs were considered to compare three types of sensitizers (Organometallics, non-metal organic dyes and, natural dyes). The objective of this study is to compare DSSCs performance when using three different sensitizers. In general, the best reported results related to DSSCs are based on organic and organometallic sensitizers. DSSCs based on organometallic compounds have an average efficiency of approximately 9.1 %, which displays the best average result; the maximum efficiency value recorded for DSSCs sensitized to organometallic compounds is 13.0 %. DSSCs based on synthetic organic sensitizers without the presence of metals in their structure, the average efficiency is approximately 7.1 % and the maximum efficiency values is 15.2 % (DSSCs utilize the co-photosensitization system and dye pre-adsorption treatment). DSSCs based on natural sensitizers indicated an average efficiency value about 0.5 % and the maximum efficiency value recorded is 2.3 %.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.