Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39801988›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2025

Conceptual and empirical item hierarchies of person-centred outpatient care.

Fredrik Gasser, Albert Westergren, Sidona-Valentina Bala, Joakim Ekstrand, Peter Hagell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fredrik GasserThe PRO-CARE Group, Faculty of Health Sciences, Kristianstad University, Kristianstad, Sweden.
Albert WestergrenThe PRO-CARE Group, Faculty of Health Sciences, Kristianstad University, Kristianstad, Sweden.
Sidona-Valentina BalaDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Joakim EkstrandThe PRO-CARE Group, Faculty of Health Sciences, Kristianstad University, Kristianstad, Sweden.
Peter HagellThe PRO-CARE Group, Faculty of Health Sciences, Kristianstad University, Kristianstad, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The Person-Centred Care instrument for outpatient care (PCCoc) is a 36-item patient-reported experience measure with 4 ordered response categories, that aims to capture the degree of perceived person-centred care (PCC) from a patient perspective among persons with long-term conditions. The PCCoc is based on a framework that conceptualises outpatient PCC from lower to higher levels of perceived PCC, from personalisation via shared decision-making to empowerment, where 35 of the PCCoc items are a part of the framework's hierarchy. Aim: To investigate to what extent empirical item responses are consistent with the hierarchical PCCoc conceptual framework among persons with long-term conditions in outpatient care. Methods: PCCoc data (323 responses) from persons with long-term psychiatric, cardiological, rheumatological or neurological conditions were analysed. The Rasch measurement model (RMM) was used to evaluate model fit and the empirical item ordering. Correspondence between the empirical and conceptually expected item hierarchies was assessed graphically and using the polyserial correlation between RMM derived item locations and their a-priori expected rank order. Result: Two items showed clear misfit to the RMM. The polyserial correlation between empirical item locations and the expected rank order using all 35 PCCoc items was 0.64; after removing the 2 misfitting items it was 0.71. In addition, subtests (i.e., testlets consisting of a combination of items belonging to the respective hierarchical domains) were created to account for any local dependency. Testlet locations on the hierarchical continuum indicated good correspondence between empirical data and the conceptual hierarchy when based on 35 as well as 33 items. Both testlet analyses had a polyserial correlation of 0.99 between testlet locations and the expected rank order. Conclusion: The observed correspondence between empirical data and the conceptual framework indicates that the PCCoc reflects the underlying framework, and therefore can be a valuable instrument to support targeted PCC-promoting interventions.

Identifiers

PMID39801988
PMCPMC11719349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.