Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39801977›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2025

Mitigating lead acetate-induced histopathologic and physiologic disorders in rats receiving vitamin C and glutathione supplement.

Mohamed Gaber Shalan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Ameliorative effects ofAvicenna journal of phytomedicine · 2026
    Article
  5. Toxics · 2025
    Article
  6. GGV formula attenuates CClFrontiers in nutrition · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Mohamed Gaber ShalanZoology and Entomology Department, Faculty of Science, Arish University, North Sinai, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present work examines the extreme impact of lead acetate and the preventive function of co-supplementation with vitamin C and glutathione. It hypothesizes that these supplements can alleviate the poisonous effects of lead exposure. Eighty male albino rats, weighing 100 ± 15 g, were categorized into four groups: the control group, the second group receiving daily supplements of 100 mg/kg of body weight glutathione and 1 mg/100 g of body weight vitamin C orally, the third group receiving 100 mg/kg body weight of lead acetate orally daily, and the fourth group receiving similar oral dosages of lead acetate along with glutathione and vitamin C. Lead exposure significantly decreased body weight and relative testis weight, while relative organ weights for the liver, kidney, and spleen increased significantly. Additionally, lead acetate increased plasma glutamic pyruvic transaminase and glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase activities and plasma creatinine concentration (p < 0.05). Lead concentration rose significantly in blood, urine, liver, and kidney (p < 0.05). Examinations revealed that lead acetate exposure induced apoptotic DNA fragmentation in hepatocytes, significantly increasing caspase-3 activity (91 %) and annexin V indicators. Moreover, lead exposure induced a decrease in sperm count and motility, along with an increase in abnormal sperm morphology. However, vitamin C and glutathione supplementation significantly improved these adverse impacts, suggesting their protective function in counteracting the harmful impacts of lead acetate in different organs.

Indexed as

ApoptosisGlutathioneLead acetateSupplementVitamin C

Identifiers

PMID39801977
PMCPMC11719362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.