ArticleHeliyon2025
The unit size effect on chocolate consumption: How to make consumers eat less? (The unit size effect on chocolate consumption).
Article in Heliyon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Managing snacking behaviors through energy density, portion control, sensory properties, and packaging.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Study on the Extent of the Maillard Reaction in Chocolate.Journal of agricultural and food chemistry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding the impact of environmental stimuli, such as nudges, on consumption behavior is crucial for developing effective dietary interventions. This study investigates the unit size effect, a behaviourally-oriented nudge, on chocolate consumption. In particular, it examines how different unit sizes and the presence or absence of packaging influence the quantity of chocolate consumed and the perceived energy intake in grams and calories. The research contributes to the theoretical framework of nudge theory, particularly the concept of unit bias, which suggests that larger units lead to higher consumption volumes. The novelty of this paper lies in its exploration of the combined effects of unit size and packaging and healthy lifestyle on consumption behavior, a relatively under-researched area. The methodology involved an experiment with four focus groups, differentiated by health-consciousness, who were provided with chocolate in varying unit sizes and packaging conditions. The data from the experiments were subjected to a three-way repeated measures ANOVA (RM-ANOVA) model. The results indicated that larger unit sizes significantly increase consumption compared to smaller units, regardless of packaging. This demonstrates that unit size has a greater impact on consumption than packaging, reinforcing the power of unit bias. The health-conscious participants consumed a markedly lower quantity of packed chocolates and exhibited a tendency to significantly overestimate the amount consumed, suggesting that those who are health-conscious may be more conscious of their diet. The findings support the effectiveness of behaviourally-oriented nudge marketing tools in influencing consumption behavior without altering consumer knowledge or emotions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.