ArticleHeliyon2025
Doctors' satisfaction with the rehabilitation system for anti-terrorist operation participants: A factor analysis.
Article in Heliyon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: A war has a catastrophic effect on veterans' health. However, there is a knowledge gap about the veterans' rehabilitation system, requirements, and the satisfaction of doctor-organizers. The present study aims to assess the level of satisfaction of the doctor-organizers of health care with the existing rehabilitation system for anti-terrorist operation (ATO) veterans in Ukraine. Methods: A cross-sectional design was conducted during the ATO in March-April 2020. A total of 25 organizing doctors from healthcare institutions filled out the form. The questionnaire consisted of three blocks: 1) Main characteristics of the existing system of rehabilitation of ATO veterans (14 items); 2) Strengths of the existing system of rehabilitation of ATO veterans (11 items); and 3) Weaknesses of the existing system of rehabilitation of ATO veterans (8 items). Evaluation of the rehabilitation system was carried out using factor analysis. Results: The main features of the system were accessibility, financing of rehabilitation programs, and commitment to the rehabilitation of ATO veterans. The advantages of the system included 1) doctors and organizers identifying the regulatory and legal provision of medical and social protection for the rehabilitation of veterans, 2) access to experienced personnel to carry it out, 3) respectful attitude towards veterans, and 4) comprehensive rehabilitation. In addition, disadvantages inherent in the system included: 1) violation of the integral principle, 2) insufficient material, technical support, and financial resources for rehabilitation programs, and 3) legislative and regulatory gaps necessary to provide rehabilitation to ATO veterans. Conclusions: The findings provided healthcare organizers with information on the main features, advantages, and disadvantages of the rehabilitation of ATO veterans. These insights can aid in optimizing the current rehabilitation system in Ukraine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.