Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39801952›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2025

Extraction and characterization of spherical nanocellulose from sesame husks.

Mohammed Al-Haql, Hoda Habbal, Bassam Al Oklah, Nesreen Qurabi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mohammed Al-HaqlDepartment of Food Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Damascus University, Syria.
Hoda HabbalDepartment of Food Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Damascus University, Syria.
Bassam Al OklahDepartment of Food Technology, National Commission for Biotechnology, Damascus, Syria.
Nesreen QurabiDepartment of Food Engineering Technologies, Faculty of Technical Engineering, Aleppo University, Syria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to extract and characterize nanocellulose from sesame husks, which are typically discarded as waste by sesame processing facilities. However, these husks are rich in cellulose, presenting a valuable potential source for nanocellulose. Sesame husk cellulose (SHC) was initially isolated through a multi-step process that removed oil, hemicellulose, and lignin. Sesame husk nanocellulose (SHNC) was subsequently obtained via acid hydrolysis. Energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) analysis revealed a purity of 99.32 % for SHNC. The yields of SHC and SHNC were 25.16 % and 9.17 %, respectively. SHNC exhibited a lower surface charge (-27.2 mV) compared to SHC (-15.5 mV). FTIR confirmed the presence of characteristic cellulose bands. Dynamic light scattering (DLS) revealed average particle diameters of 2235 nm for SHC and 108.1 nm for SHNC. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) and field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) analyses showed that SHNC particles were spherical to oval-shaped, with average diameters of 78.41 nm and 74.30 nm, respectively. The crystallinity index was higher for SHNC (67.74 %) compared to SHC (41.02 %). Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) indicated greater thermal stability for SHC (TMax 317 °C) compared to SHNC (TMax 287 °C). These results demonstrate the potential of sesame husks as a sustainable and valuable source of nanocellulose.

Indexed as

Acid hydrolysisEco-friendlyHusksNanocelluloseSesame

Identifiers

PMID39801952
PMCPMC11721230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.