ArticleSleep and biological rhythms2025
Association of sleep duration and all-cause and cancer-specific mortality: results of 2004 national health interview survey (NHIS).
Article in Sleep and biological rhythms, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Adherence to 24-hour movement guidelines and mortality risks in US cancer survivors: a national cohort study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- Sleep debt and depressive symptoms among workers: the mediating role of fatigue.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Association between sleep duration and mortality in cancer patients.Sleep and biological rhythms · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Epidemiologic research has demonstrated a connection between the duration of sleep and the risk of overall mortality. This research investigates the correlation between sleep duration (SD) and the likelihood of all-cause and cancer-specific mortality among cancer patients, exploring the association between SD and mortality risk. The study used the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) data from 2004, a U.S.-based survey linked to a mortality database up to December 31, 2019. A total of 26,976 participants based on cancer responses, including 2082 cancer patients and 24,894 non-cancer patients, were included in this study. Participants self-reported SD (categorized as ≤ 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, or ≥ 10 h/day) was used. The Cox proportional hazards model for mortality risk was performed with demographic adjustments. Mortality risk was higher in adults with and without cancer and extremes (insufficient or more than sufficient) of SD. A J-shaped association was found between SD and all-cause and cancer-specific mortality risk among cancer and non-cancer patients. Among the cancer patients, compared with the reference group (7 h/day), both shorter and longer SDs were associated with increased risk of all-cause and cancer-specific mortality (≤ 5 h/day, HR 1.48 CI [1.77, 1.88]; 8 h/day, HR 1.45 CI [1.23, 1.72]; 9 h/day, HR 1.53 CI [1.18,1.99], ≥ 10 h/day, HR 2.15 CI [1.66, 2.78]); except the SD 6 h/day, HR 1.14 CI [0.93, 1.40]. The analysis included 349,936 person-years of observation. This study suggests that sleeping too long and too short is associated with increased risk among patients with all-cause and cancer-specific mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.