ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2025
Construction and Comparison of Machine Learning-Based Risk Prediction Models for Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Perimenopausal Women.
Article in International journal of general medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mechanism of Microbiota-Gut-Brain in Perimenopausal Depression: An Inflammatory Perspective.Expert reviews in molecular medicine · 2025Review
- Development and internal validation of an OPCABG-specific prediction model for postoperative atrial fibrillation in Chinese patients: a retrospective cohort study.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Article
- Association between residual cholesterol and vulnerable non-culprit lesions progressing to major adverse cardiovascular events.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Perimenopausal period is a period of physiological changes in women with signs of ovarian failure, including menopausal transition period and 1 year after menopause. Ovarian function declines in perimenopausal women and lower estrogen levels lead to changes in the function of various organs, which may lead to cardiovascular disease. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) are the combination of clinical events including heart failure, myocardial infarction and other cardiovascular diseases. Therefore, this study explores the factors influencing the occurrence of MACE in perimenopausal women and establishes a prediction model for MACE risk factors using three algorithms, comparing their predictive performance. Patients and Methods: A total of 411 perimenopausal women diagnosed with MACE at the Binzhou Medical University Hospital were randomly divided into a training set and a test set following a 7:3 ratio. According to the principle of 10 events per Variable, the training set sample size was sufficient. In the training set, Random Forest (RF) algorithm, backpropagation neural network (BPNN) and Logistic Regression (LR) were used to construct a MACE risk prediction model for perimenopausal women, and the test set was used to verify the model. The prediction performance of the model was evaluated in terms of accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the subject operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results: A total of twenty-six candidate variables were included. The area under ROC curve of the RF model, BPNN model, and logistic regression model was 0.948, 0.921, and 0.866. Comparison of ROC curve AUC between logistic regression and RF model for predicting MACE risk showed a statistically significant difference (Z=2.278, Conclusion: The RF model showed good performance in predicting the risk of MACE in perimenopausal women providing a reference for the early identification of high-risk patients and the development of targeted intervention strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.