Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39801922›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2025

Construction and Comparison of Machine Learning-Based Risk Prediction Models for Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Perimenopausal Women.

Anjing Chen, Xinyue Chang, Xueling Bian, Fangxia Zhang, Shasha Ma, Xiaolin Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of general medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anjing Chen *College of Nursing, Binzhou Medical University, Shandong, 256600, People's Republic of China.
Xinyue Chang *Vascular Surgery Department, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Binzhou, Shandong, 250001, People's Republic of China.
Xueling BianCollege of Nursing, Binzhou Medical University, Shandong, 256600, People's Republic of China.
Fangxia ZhangCCU, Binzhou Medical University Hospital, Binzhou, Shandong, 256600, People's Republic of China.
Shasha MaNeurology Department, Binzhou Medical University Hospital, Binzhou, Shandong, 256600, People's Republic of China.
Xiaolin ChenOffice of Health Care, Binzhou Medical University Hospital, Binzhou, Shandong, 256600, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Perimenopausal period is a period of physiological changes in women with signs of ovarian failure, including menopausal transition period and 1 year after menopause. Ovarian function declines in perimenopausal women and lower estrogen levels lead to changes in the function of various organs, which may lead to cardiovascular disease. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) are the combination of clinical events including heart failure, myocardial infarction and other cardiovascular diseases. Therefore, this study explores the factors influencing the occurrence of MACE in perimenopausal women and establishes a prediction model for MACE risk factors using three algorithms, comparing their predictive performance. Patients and Methods: A total of 411 perimenopausal women diagnosed with MACE at the Binzhou Medical University Hospital were randomly divided into a training set and a test set following a 7:3 ratio. According to the principle of 10 events per Variable, the training set sample size was sufficient. In the training set, Random Forest (RF) algorithm, backpropagation neural network (BPNN) and Logistic Regression (LR) were used to construct a MACE risk prediction model for perimenopausal women, and the test set was used to verify the model. The prediction performance of the model was evaluated in terms of accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the subject operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results: A total of twenty-six candidate variables were included. The area under ROC curve of the RF model, BPNN model, and logistic regression model was 0.948, 0.921, and 0.866. Comparison of ROC curve AUC between logistic regression and RF model for predicting MACE risk showed a statistically significant difference (Z=2.278, Conclusion: The RF model showed good performance in predicting the risk of MACE in perimenopausal women providing a reference for the early identification of high-risk patients and the development of targeted intervention strategies.

Indexed as

machine learningmajor adverse cardiovascular eventsperimenopauserisk factor

Identifiers

PMID39801922
PMCPMC11721002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.