ArticleJournal of orthopaedics2025
The effect of adductor canal block on outcomes of total knee arthroplasty: A single centre, historical cohort study.
Article in Journal of orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Adductor canal blocks (ACBs) have been associated with reduced pain following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). There is a paucity of evidence regarding whether these early differences impact longer term outcomes. This study aimed to identify whether using ACB in TKA was associated with improvements in both early and late outcomes. Methods: Patients who underwent a unilateral TKA between 2021 and 2022 were retrospectively assessed for pain scores, time to first mobilization and opioid use over the first 72 h. At 6 weeks, complications, pain scores and opioid use were assessed. At 12 months validated patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient satisfaction with their surgery were assessed. Results: 262 unilateral TKA, of whom 129 received ACB (ACB group) and 133 did not (control group) were assessed. The ACB group had significantly lower median day 1 pain (median difference -0.44 (-0.09 to -0.79), p = 0.015). There was no significant difference between groups for pain after 24 h, time to mobilization or opioid use over 72 h. There was no significant difference in pain (p = 0.892), opioid use (p = 0.913) or complications (p = 0.348) at 6 weeks, or median change in PROMs (p = 0.436 and p = 0.307), opioid use (p = 0.187), or satisfaction with surgery (p = 0.262) at 12 months. Conclusion: ACBs were associated with a clinically insignificant difference in median pain on day 1. there was no association with pain after 24 h, opioid use, time to mobilization or longer term outcomes. Our findings do not support the use of routine ACB during TKA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.