Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39801861›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic case reports2025

Custom-Made 3D-Printed Augments and Cages: An Effective Solution for Managing Severe Acetabular Bone Loss.

Adarsh Annapareddy, Vijay C Bose, Ameya Ajit Katariya, Praharsha Mulpur, Tarun Jayakumar, Mujtaba Ansari, Chandan S, A V Gurava Reddy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Adarsh AnnapareddyDepartment of Orthopaedic, Sunshine Bone and Joint Insitute, KIMS-Sunshine Hospitals, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Vijay C BoseDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgeon, Asian Orthopaedic Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Ameya Ajit KatariyaDepartment of Orthopaedic, Sunshine Bone and Joint Insitute, KIMS-Sunshine Hospitals, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Praharsha MulpurDepartment of Orthopaedic, Sunshine Bone and Joint Insitute, KIMS-Sunshine Hospitals, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Tarun JayakumarDepartment of Orthopaedic, Sunshine Bone and Joint Insitute, KIMS-Sunshine Hospitals, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Mujtaba AnsariDepartment of Orthopaedic, Sunshine Bone and Joint Insitute, KIMS-Sunshine Hospitals, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Chandan SDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgeon, Asian Orthopaedic Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
A V Gurava ReddyDepartment of Orthopaedic, Sunshine Bone and Joint Insitute, KIMS-Sunshine Hospitals, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is recognized as one of the most effective surgical procedures for the treatment of end-stage hip arthritis. However, the increasing number of primary THA cases has led to a corresponding rise in the frequency of revision surgeries, which are often more complex and challenging due to severe acetabular bone loss. In such cases, managing Paprosky type 3A and 3B defects requires precise implant design and advanced surgical techniques. Standard acetabular augments and anti-protrusio cages are commonly used, but they often fail to provide the necessary stability, leading to re-revision rates as high as 36% within 10 years. This case series explores the efficacy of custom-made 3D-printed acetabular augments and cages in managing severe acetabular bone loss during revision THA. Materials and Methods: This retrospective case series includes seven patients who underwent revision THA for Paprosky grade 3 acetabular bone loss between January 2023 and April 2024 at two high-volume tertiary care centers. The mean age of the patients was 45 years, with three males and four females included in the study. Pre-operative planning involved advanced imaging techniques, including 3D-computed tomography scans and custom virtual modeling, to design the acetabular components tailored to each patient's specific anatomical requirements.During the surgeries, custom-made 3D-printed titanium augments and cages were used. These implants were fabricated using in-house software, and the turnaround time from the decision to surgery was approximately 10 days. Post-operatively, the planned 3D model was superimposed on post-operative radiographs to assess implant placement accuracy. The Harris hip score at the final follow-up averaged 69.16, with no signs of implant loosening observed. Conclusion: Custom-made 3D-printed acetabular augments and cages offer a reliable and cost-effective solution for managing severe acetabular bone loss in revision THA. Despite the small sample size and short follow-up period, the results demonstrate the potential of these custom implants to improve outcomes in complex acetabular reconstructions. Further studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods are needed to confirm these findings and establish long-term efficacy.

Indexed as

3D-printing3D reconstructionAcetabular bone losscustom augmentscustom cagespatients-specific implant

Identifiers

PMID39801861
PMCPMC11723743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.