Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39801791›Full record

ArticleGates open research2024

Developing and evaluating human-centered design solutions for enhancing maternal health service utilization among vulnerable pregnant women in Oromia, Ethiopia: Study protocol for a quasi-experimental study.

Bee-Ah Kang, Habtamu Tamene, Yihunie Lakew, Daryl Stephens, Rajiv Rimal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gates open research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bee-Ah KangDepartment of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, 624 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD, 21215, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1124-2481
Habtamu TameneCenter for Communication Programs, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Africa Avenue (Bole Road), Dembel City Center 10th Floor, P.O Box: 26171, Addis Ababa, 1000, Ethiopia.
Yihunie LakewCenter for Communication Programs, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Africa Avenue (Bole Road), Dembel City Center 10th Floor, P.O Box: 26171, Addis Ababa, 1000, Ethiopia.
Daryl StephensDepartment of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, 624 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD, 21215, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-0167-2920
Rajiv RimalDepartment of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, 624 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD, 21215, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1413-9305

Funding

Gates Foundation INV-035431
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Disproportionate uptake of and access to maternal and child health services remain significant challenges across and within countries. Differing geographic, economic, environmental, and social factors contribute to varying degrees of vulnerabilities among individuals, which manifest as disparities in maternal and newborn health outcomes. Designing solutions according to need is vital to improve maternal and child health outcomes. In this paper, we describe our study protocol on developing and evaluating the effectiveness of human-centered design (HCD) solutions to improve maternal health service uptake among vulnerable pregnant women in rural areas of Ethiopia. Methods: The study has two distinct phases. In Phase 1, HCD solutions were developed through co-design workshops with vulnerable pregnant women and key stakeholders. Final solutions included home visit education, audio programs promoting couple discussion, and print materials, implemented in collaboration with community health workers and health officers. A community-based, quasi-experimental, mixed-method study design was used to assess differences between intervention and control arms. A panel sample was enrolled after screening for pregnancy and vulnerability level and surveyed at baseline and midline in Phase 1. Phase 2 adopts an identical design approach with a focus on refining Phase 1 solutions. Newly recruited pregnant women will receive refined solutions for six months, which will be evaluated using post-only end-line surveys and in-depth interviews. Conclusions and Implications: Our sequential approach to evaluating initial solutions, which in turn will inform the enhancement of solutions, will provide practical insights into how solutions are accepted among vulnerable women and how they can be better integrated into women's lives and health systems. This will inform equity-focused practice and policies targeting populations experiencing greater barriers to accessing care and provide insights into system strengthening in rural areas. Our findings will be disseminated to the Ethiopian Ministry of Health and its partners to inform large-scale implementation at the national level.

Indexed as

Maternal Health ServicesPatient Acceptance of Health CarePregnant PeopleVulnerable PopulationsAdultCommunity Health WorkersEthiopiaFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansPregnancyResearch DesignRural Populationhuman-centered designmaternal and child healthresearch protocolvulnerability

Identifiers

PMID39801791
PMCPMC11723881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.