ReviewBioengineering & translational medicine2025
Cardiovascular patches applied in congenital cardiac surgery: Current materials and prospects.
Review in Bioengineering & translational medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hematologic complications and design challenges in cardiovascular devices.Communications engineering · 2026Review
- Extracellular Matrix Tissue Patch for Pulmonary Artery Repair in Pediatric Cardiac Surgery: A Single-Center Experience.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Bioengineered cardiovascular bypass grafts via in vivo self-assembly of scaffold-guided tubular tissue in rats.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2025Article
- Extracellular Matrix Tissue Patch for Aortic Arch Repair in Pediatric Cardiac Surgery: A Single-Center Experience.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Cardiovascular patches applied in congenital cardiac surgery: Current materials and prospects.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2025Review
- Regenerative and molecular therapies for myocardial repair (Review).Medicine internationalReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Congenital Heart Defects (CHDs) are the most common congenital anomalies, affecting between 4 and 75 per 1000 live births. Cardiovascular patches (CVPs) are frequently used as part of the surgical armamentarium to reconstruct cardiovascular structures to correct CHDs in pediatric patients. This review aims to evaluate the history of cardiovascular patches, currently available options, clinical applications, and important features of these patches. Performance and outcomes of different patch materials are assessed to provide reference points for clinicians. The target audience includes clinicians seeking data on clinical performance as they make choices between different patch products, as well as scientists and engineers working to develop patches or synthesize new patch materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.