Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39801729›Full record

ArticleJSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons

Comparison of Stump Closure Methods in Laparoscopic Appendectomy: Hem-o-Lok Clip and Laparoscopic Titanium Clip.

Mehmet Uçar, Aziz Bulut

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mehmet UçarBingöl State Hospital, Department of General Surgery, Bingöl/Turkey (Dr. Uçar).
Aziz BulutGaziantep University Faculty of Medicine, Department of General Surgery, Gaziantep/Turkey. (Dr. Bulut).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Appendectomy for acute appendicitis is the most common acute abdominal surgery. Open and laparoscopic appendectomy surgeries are performed with different techniques. Laparoscopic appendectomy has become a widespread method due to its advantages. The aim of this study is to compare the complications, surgery time, hospitalization length, and cost-effectiveness of titanium clips and hem-o-lok clips for stump closure in laparoscopic appendectomy. Methods: This study included 187 patients who were operated on laparoscopically for acute appendicitis at our hospital between April 2019 and June 2022. The patients' follow-up for 30 days after surgery was evaluated. The data of 179 patients in whom titanium and hem-o-lok clips were inserted during an appendectomy were included in the study. Results: Between April 2019 and June 2022, 179 patients were included in the study retrospectively. When the correlation between complications and surgical methods was analyzed, 98.8% of the hem-o-lok clip group and 99% of the titanium clip group had no complications. No statistically significant difference was observed between complications and surgery type ( Conclusions: It is concluded that the use of titanium clips that completely close the root of the appendix is as safe, accessible, feasible, practical, and effective as the hem-o-lok clip method. It was observed to be used safely as an alternative to other appendix root closure methods.

Indexed as

AppendectomyAppendicitisLaparoscopySurgical InstrumentsAdolescentAdultCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedOperative TimePostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesTitaniumTitaniumAcute appendicitisHem-o-lok clipsLaparoscopic appendectomyTitanium clips

Identifiers

PMID39801729
PMCPMC11723334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.