ArticleCureus2025
Partnering With Patients to Improve a Multidisciplinary Sexual Dysfunction Program: A Survey of Patient Experience at a Single Institution.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Erectile Dysfunction: A Comprehensive Review of Pathophysiology, Diagnosis and Contemporary Management.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Sexual Dysfunction in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Narrative Review and Call for Multidisciplinary Framework.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Sexual dysfunction is highly prevalent. The Loyola University Medical Center Sexual Wellness Program (LU-SWP), a multidisciplinary program, uses a biopsychosocial and educational model to collaborate with patients in their treatment. Objective This study aims to examine the reported satisfaction scores for the LU-SWP and its activities based on a patient survey completed at the end of the program. Patient involvement Patients of the LU-SWP completed surveys gauging their opinions on presentations given and techniques used during the 6-week program. These surveys aided in program adjustments that increased patient-centeredness. Methods It is a retrospective assessment of patient satisfaction scores of the LU-SWP from 2014 to 2020. Results Eighty-five of the 90 participants completed the survey, giving a 94% response rate. The mean age of the participants in this program was 49.8 years (SD = 13.768). The mean program satisfaction score was 8.51 (SD = ±1.43). Conclusions Because of this study, patient satisfaction scores aided in updating aspects of the LU-SWP. The scores give patients a voice in their care and allow previous patients to act as advocates for future patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.