Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39801647›Full record

ReviewJACC. CardioOncology2024

Cardiovascular Considerations During Cancer Therapy: Gaps in Evidence and

Darryl P Leong, Sarah Waliany, Husam Abdel-Qadir, Katelyn M Atkins, Tomas G Neilan, Ninian N Lang, Jennifer E Liu, Anne H Blaes, Hira S Mian, Heather N Moore and 4 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JACC. CardioOncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Cardiac substructure dosimetry in thoracic radiotherapy: moving beyond mean heart dose and toward precision cardiac risk mitigation.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Preoperative cardiovascular evaluation in patients with cancer.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Darryl P LeongPopulation Health Research Institute, McMaster University and Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Sarah WalianyMassachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Husam Abdel-QadirWomen's College Hospital, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Katelyn M AtkinsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Tomas G NeilanDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Ninian N LangSchool of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Health, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Jennifer E LiuMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Anne H BlaesDivision of Hematology/Oncology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Hira S MianJuravinski Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Heather N MooreDepartment of Pharmacy, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Ludhmila A HajjarCardio-Oncology Department, InCor, Universidade de São Paolo, São Paolo, Brazil.
Alicia K MorgansDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Peter M EllisJuravinski Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Susan DentDuke Cancer Institute, Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The administration of certain cancer therapies can be associated with the development of cardiovascular toxicity or complications. This spectrum of toxicities is broad and requires nuanced approaches for prevention, identification, and management. This expert panel summarizes the consensus of opinions of diverse health care professionals in several key areas: 1) cardioprotection involves strategies aimed at the primary prevention of cancer therapy-related cardiovascular toxicity; 2) surveillance entails monitoring for cancer therapy-related cardiovascular toxicity during cancer therapy; 3) permissive cardiotoxicity is the informed continuation of cancer therapy in the presence of cardiovascular toxicity, along with the implementation of mitigating cardiovascular treatments; and 4) special considerations include the invasive management of severe cardiovascular disease in patients receiving treatments for advanced cancer and the exploration of drug-drug interactions in cardio-oncology. In this expert panel, we also highlight gaps in evidence in an effort to continue to advance science in the cardiovascular care of our patients undergoing cancer therapy.

Indexed as

5-fluorouracilanthracyclinebiomarkersechocardiographyguidelinesheart failureHer2 therapytyrosine kinase inhibitor

Identifiers

PMID39801647
PMCPMC11711816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.