Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39801621›Full record

ArticleArXiv2025

A Systematic Computational Framework for Practical Identifiability Analysis in Mathematical Models Arising from Biology.

Shun Wang, Wenrui Hao

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in ArXiv, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shun WangDepartment of Mathematics, Penn State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Wenrui HaoDepartment of Mathematics, Penn State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, United States of America.

Funding

A pathophysiology driven spatial dynamic modeling framework for personalized prediction and precision medicineR35GM146894 · NIGMS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI WENRUI HAO · 2022 to 2026
$2.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM146894
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Practical identifiability is a fundamental challenge in the data-driven modeling of biological systems, as many model parameters cannot be directly measured and must be estimated from experimental data. Without confirming the identifiability of these parameters, model predictions may be unreliable, limiting their usefulness for understanding biological mechanisms or informing experimental and clinical decisions. In this paper, we propose a novel mathematical framework for practical identifiability analysis in dynamic models. Starting from a rigorous mathematical definition, we prove that practical identifiability is equivalent to the invertibility of the Fisher Information Matrix (FIM). We further establish the relationship between practical identifiability and coordinate identifiability, introducing an efficient metric that simplifies and accelerates identifiability assessment compared to traditional profile likelihood methods. To address non-identifiable parameters, we incorporate new regularization terms, enabling uncertainty quantification and improving model reliability. Additionally, we develop an optimal experimental design algorithm to ensure all parameters are practically identifiable from collected data. Applications to Hill functions, neural networks, and biological models demonstrate the effectiveness and computational efficiency of the proposed framework in uncovering critical biological processes and identifying key observable variables.

Indexed as

Optimal Data CollectionParameter RegularizationPractical IdentifiabilityUncertainty Quantification

Identifiers

PMID39801621
PMCPMC11722522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.