Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39801580›Full record

ArticleDigital health

eHealth, digital information and technology use of men with prostate cancer.

Stuart R Jackson, Paul Yu, Steven Sowter, Stefano Occhipinti, Suzanne Chambers, Scott Leslie, Manish I Patel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Stuart R JacksonThe University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2459-8399
Paul YuDepartment of Urology, Westmead Hospital, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-4075-4049
Steven SowterUniversity of New South Wales, Wagga Wagga, Australia.
Stefano OcchipintiSchool of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia.
Suzanne ChambersFaculty of Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Sydney, Australia.
Scott LeslieRPA Institute of Academic Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Manish I PatelThe University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The investigation of digital information sources and technologies specifically used by men with prostate cancer is scarce. This study seeks to address current gaps in the literature by investigating prostate cancer-specific internet and technology use by men with prostate cancer and factors associated with this use. Methods: Cross-sectional surveys were conducted in three Australian urology clinics (local in Sydney, Western Sydney and Murrumbidgee) in 2023. Data analysis included descriptive and bivariate analysis. Chi square tests of independence, Mann-Whitney Results: A total of 349 men responded. Mean age of respondents was 69.6 years (SD 7.8). 74.5% ( Conclusions: Men with prostate cancer use a broad variety of digital information sources and technologies to access prostate cancer information at a higher rate than ever before. This work stresses the significant variability in the extent of use which men demonstrate among these resources and the factors which may play a role in this behaviour.

Indexed as

cancerdigitaleHealthinformationInternetprostatesocialtechnology

Identifiers

PMID39801580
PMCPMC11719434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.