ArticleDigital health
A qualitative exploration of the early adoption of an electronic medical record system for type 1 diabetes management in Rwanda.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Delivering adequate quality care remains a challenge in many low-and middle-income countries (LMICs), especially for people living with type 1 diabetes (T1D), requiring a complex treatment regimen. Digital health solutions, including electronic medical record (EMR) systems, have shown potential to improve delivery and quality of care but still require a successful implementation. Objective: To analyze the adoption of a newly implemented EMR system in Rwanda from the perspectives of individuals with T1D, health care providers, and experts. Study design: A qualitative study was conducted using the Diffusion of Innovation (DoI) theory to guide the focus of the analysis. A data triangulation strategy was used to gain multi-dimensional insights, involving in-depth interviews and participant observations with T1D individuals, EMR system users, and experts (with varying levels of acquaintance with the EMR system). Experiences of early adoption of the EMR system were explored through thematic analysis guided by the DoI theory. Results: In general, all the participant groups had a positive attitude towards the EMR system, believed to increase the likelihood of a successful implementation. The system was described as user-friendly and improved workflows, data quality, and patient care. The main concerns to successful adoption were related to the maintenance and long-term sustainability of the system. Conclusion: The EMR system showed great potential, was valued by users, and was positively believed to have potential to improve care and outcomes for patients. However, sustainability aspects must not be overlooked when assessing the adoption and use of an EMR system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.