ArticleResearch square2025
Multiscale Cell-Cell Interactive Spatial Transcriptomics Analysis.
Article in Research square, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Spatial transcriptomics data analysis integrates gene expression profiles with their corresponding spatial locations to identify spatial domains, infer cell-type dynamics, and detect gene expression patterns within tissues. However, the current spatial transcriptomics analysis neglects the multiscale cell-cell interactions that are crucial in biology. To fill this gap, we propose multiscale cell-cell interactive spatial transcriptomics (MCIST) analysis. MCIST combines the advantages of an ensemble of multiscale topological representations of cell-cell interactions in the gene expression space with those of cutting edge spatial deep learning techniques. We validate MCIST by a comparison of 14 cutting edge methods on a huge collection of 37 benchmark spatial transcriptomics datasets. We demonstrate that MCIST yields superior performance in spatial domain detection. It achieves the best clustering score on 23/37 datasets and is among the top three methods on 33/37 datasets, whereas the second best method scored only 6/37 and 17/37 on these measures, respectively. In terms of overall performance with regards to a quantitative metric, MCIST offers over an 11% improvement to the previous state-of-the-art in spatial domain detection. Additionally, MCIST offers multiscale insights with respect to trajectory inference, differentially expressed gene detection, and signaling pathway enrichment analysis. Our MCIST sheds valuable light on the multiscale perspective in spatial transcriptomics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.