ArticleJournal of analytical toxicology2025
Beyond the baseline: quantification of two phosphatidylethanol homologues in whole blood by LC-MS-MS and retrospective data analysis from a National Reference Laboratory.
Article in Journal of analytical toxicology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrated internal standard volumetric dried blood microsampling for the quantification of phosphatidylethanol 16:0/18:1.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026Article
- Reference values for the alcohol biomarker phosphatidylethanol (PEth) in the Belgian population: Insights from a nationwide microsampling study.Drug and alcohol dependence reports · 2026Article
- Rapid Selective Detection of Phosphatidylethanols by Neutral Loss Scans in Tandem Mass Spectrometry to Evaluate Alcohol Consumption.Analytical chemistry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Alcohol is the most abused substance in Western society, resulting in major economic losses and negative health consequences. Therefore, there is a need for a selective and robust detection method for alcohol consumption in various clinical and forensic settings. This study aimed to validate a mass spectrometry method for quantifying phosphatidylethanol (PEth) and perform retrospective data analysis from the patient population of a national reference laboratory. Quantification of PEth in whole blood was accomplished using an LC-MS-MS assay. Isotopically labeled internal standard for the two PEth homologues was added to the whole-blood specimen, followed by protein precipitation with a mixture of acetonitrile and isopropyl alcohol. After centrifugation, an aliquot of the supernatant was buffered with ammonium acetate before LC-MS-MS analysis on an Agilent 6470 triple quadrupole mass spectrometer coupled to an Agilent 1260 Infinity II LC system. This LC-MS-MS assay was validated for clinical use in accordance with Clinical & Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. The analytical measurement range, 10-2000 ng/mL, was linear with R2 of 0.999. The within-run and total imprecision was < 5% CV for the low (20 ng/mL), medium (200 ng/mL), and high QC (1000 ng/mL). Results from accuracy and method comparison experiments met the bias criteria of ±15%. Retrospective data analysis showed ∼27% of patients had PEth concentrations <20 ng/mL. Males and females had similar positivity rates for PEth and the positivity rate of women of reproductive age (15-44 years old) was 35% in comparison to 25% in women 45-89 years old. This study's LC-MS-MS method showed acceptable analytical performance in quantifying PEth as a sensitive and specific biomarker for evaluating alcohol consumption. Results from this study may provide an opportunity to educate women of reproductive age on drinking during pregnancy and the long-term effects of alcohol use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.