ArticleSmall (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany)2025
Microplastic Materials for Inhalation Studies: Preparation by Solvent Precipitation and Comprehensive Characterization.
Article in Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Polyurethane-Derived Microplastics and Nanoplastics: Sources, Human Exposure, and Toxicological and Health Effects.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Lung retention, distribution and persistence of polymer particles in rats exposed via inhalation.Particle and fibre toxicology · 2026Article
- Fabrication of microplastic and nanoplastic particles and fibres for use in pulmonary toxicity studies.Particle and fibre toxicology · 2025Article
- Development and characterization of reference environmentally relevant micro-nano-plastics for risk assessment studies.NanoImpact · 2025Article
- Microplastic Materials for Inhalation Studies: Preparation by Solvent Precipitation and Comprehensive Characterization.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Assessing the inhalation hazard of microplastics is important but necessitates sufficient quantity of microplastics that are representative and respirable (<4 µm). Common plastics are not typically manufactured in such small sizes. Here, solvent precipitation is used to produce respirable test materials from thermoplastics polyurethane (TPU), polyamide (PA-6), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), and low-density polyethylene (LDPE). Complementary methods verified that the desired size range is achieved both in number metrics and in mass metrics. To assess if the test materials are representative of their original plastic, a range of molecular properties, particle properties, and impurities are characterized: chemical composition, molecular weight, crystallinity, molecular mobility, density, surface charge, surface reactivity, particle size in mass and number metrics, particle shape, endotoxin content, and solvent content. The test materials obtained by precipitation are compared to commercial granules as references, and to alternative test materials obtained by other synthesis routes from LDPE, TPU, PET, PA-6, polystyrene (PS), and polyvinylchloride (PVC). Charge and surface reactivity of the precipitated test materials are low. Due to storage in water, microbial contamination needed to be monitored. For PET, PA-6, and TPU, the test materials are considered as representative and fit for purpose, whereas the inherent hydrophobicity of LDPE imposed strong aggregation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.