ArticleMolecular ecology2025
Empowering Regional Conservation: Genetic Diversity Assessments as a Tool for Eelgrass Management.
Article in Molecular ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Influence of Spatial Distance and Environment on Small-Scale Genetic Variability in Eelgrass and Its Application for Restoration.Evolutionary applications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To halt the loss of biodiversity, collaboration among scientists, managers and decision-makers is vital. Although biodiversity loss is a global problem, management actions influencing diversity are often on a local to regional scale. Our study is an example of a regional conservation genomic assessment developed in collaboration between scientists and managers. We used 2bRAD sequencing to assess 18 eelgrass (Zostera marina) meadows in northwestern Sweden, an area that has experienced large losses of eelgrass since the 1980s. Genetic diversity was comparable to other assessed meadows in the Atlantic, but an order of magnitude lower than eelgrass in the Pacific. All but one meadow showed high rates of sexual reproduction. Almost all meadows were divergent but grouped into five genetic clusters. Four of the clusters correspond to geographic regions that can be used to define management units. Meadows in areas with a high decline in eelgrass between the 1980s and 2020s are more inbred than meadows in areas with an increase in eelgrass. Overall, our results indicate that striving to protect a number of large eelgrass meadows within each genetic cluster is important for maintaining the genetic diversity and connectivity of eelgrass in northwestern Sweden and is likely beneficial for the wider ecosystem. We estimate current indicators and essential biodiversity variables and discuss their challenges in marine facultative clonal species. We showcase how regional-scale conservation genomic assessments can serve as a foundation for protection and restoration of a priority species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.