Observational studyEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2025
The effect of degenerative scolioisis on segmental thoracolumbar sagittal alignment compared to age- and pelvic incidence-matched reference values.
Observational study in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIn asymptomatic subjects, variations of sagittal alignment parameters according to age and pelvic incidence (PI) has been reported. The aim of this observational study was to describe thoraco-lumbar sagittal alignment in patients with degenerative scoliosis and to compare them to asymptomatic individuals, seeking for the specific effect of deformity in similar age and PI groups. MATERIALS AND
methodsFull spine radiographs of 235 asymptomatic subjects and 243 scoliosis patients were analyzed: cervico-thoracic inflexion point (CTIP), thoraco-lumbar inflexion point (TLIP), lumbar lordosis (LL) L1-S1, LL (TLIP-S1), LL superior arch (TLIP-lumbar apex), LL inferior arch (lumbar apex-S1), PI, thoracic kyphosis (TK) T5-T12, TK T1-T12, number of vertebrae CTIP-TLIPandTLIP-S1. The distribution of parameters was analyzed using a Bayesian inference (significant when Pr > 0.975 or Pr < 0.025). Comparisons between reference (R) and pathologic (P) groups were matched according to age (40-60 years; >60 years) and PI (< 45°; 45-60°; >60°).
resultsLL L1-S1 was significantly lower in the P-group (Pr = 1.0), decreased with age (Pr > 0.99) and increased with PI (Pr < 0.001). In contrast, there was no significant decrease with age for LL (TLIP-S1) or LL (superior arch) (respectively Pr < 0.92 and Pr > 0.19). LL in the inferior arch was significantly lower in the P-group (Pr = 1.0) and decreased with age (Pr = 0.99). The number of vertebrae TLIP-S1 was significantly lower in the P-group compared to the reference group (Pr < 0.001).Thoracic kyphosis T1-T12 was significantly lower in the P-group (Pr < 0.001), without significant influence of age or PI. The number of vertebrae CTIP-TLIP increased significantly in the P-group (Pr < 0.001) and with PI (Pr < 0.004).
conclusionThis observational study highlights specific thoraco-lumbar sagittal alignment adaptations in degenerative scoliosis, matched on age and PI. Beyond the decrease in LL due to aging, degenerative scoliosis leads to a distal migration of the TLIP, an increase in the number of vertebrae in TK and a decrease in LL. This phenomenon was linked to kyphosis at the thoraco-lumbar junction due to scoliosis and was more important in high PI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39800820What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.