ArticleNeurosurgical review2025
Characteristics and recovery trends of severe TBI patients with a favorable functional outcome at 6-month follow-up.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The impact of glasgow outcome scale - extended cut-point of dichotomization on factors associated with outcomes in traumatic brain injury research.Neurosurgical review · 2025Article
- Association between Neutrophil-to-Albumin Ratio and 28-Day All-Cause Mortality in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury : A Retrospective Analysis of the MIMIC-IV Database.Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society · 2025Article
- Incidence and mortality related risk factors in patients with severe traumatic brain injury: A meta‑analysis.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) is a devastating cause of death and disability. Outcomes following TBI have been extensively studied; however, less attention has been given to identifying characteristics of individuals who have a favorable outcome following severe TBI. We conducted a retrospective analysis of a database containing information on TBI patients admitted to a level 1 trauma center between 2015 and 2021. We focused on patients who were initially admitted with severe TBI (GCS 8 or lower), and had a final favorable functional outcome (GOSE 5 or higher), at six months. Our investigation aimed to identify factors associated with early in-hospital recovery versus delayed post-discharge recovery, as well as factors associated with moderate disability versus good recovery in six-month follow-up, the time that all investigated patients had achieved a favorable outcome. A total of 513 patients were included in the study. Of these, 67.2% achieved early in-hospital recovery, while 32.8% experienced delayed post-discharge recovery. Features such as anisocoric or fixed pupillary light reflex, subarachnoid hemorrhage, intraventricular hemorrhage and, the need for decompressive craniectomy, and tracheostomy were independently associated with delayed recovery in severe TBI patients. Among the 513 patients, 105 (20.4%) had moderate disability, while 408 (79.6%) were in good recovery at the six-month follow-up. Midline shift greater than 5 mm and the need for tracheostomy were independently associated with moderate disability. Our study offers insights into characteristics of severe TBI patients with a favorable outcome at six months. Our results suggest that it may be premature to predict a poor prognosis for patients with severe TBI who do not show early improvement after their injury. Interestingly, approximately one third of patients with a favorable six-month outcome fell into this category.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39800816What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.