ReviewEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2025
Trends in nanobody radiotheranostics.
Review in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Glypican-3-targeted bioconjugates for hepatocellular carcinoma: design, engineering, and translational applications.Medicinal chemistry research : an international journal for rapid communications on design and mechanisms of action of biologically active agents · 2026Review
- Non-competing Trop2 nanobody-based radiotheranostics for precision imaging and therapy of pancreatic cancer.Materials today. Bio · 2026Article
- Functional Suitability Evaluation of Radioimmunoconjugates of Nanobodies against PD-L1 and HER2/neu for Tumor Theranostics.Sovremennye tekhnologii v meditsine · 2026Article
- Emerging ImmunoPET probes for precision cancer immunotherapy: molecular targets and translational applications.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Nanobodies in biomedicine: from molecular characteristics to fabrication and clinical translation.Military Medical Research · 2026Review
- Trop2 immuno-PET/CT imaging of prostate cancer: a proof-of-concept translational study.BMC medicine · 2025Article
- A Comparative Study on the Effect of Near-Infrared Fluorescent Dyes on the Pharmacokinetic Behavior of Nanobody-Based Tracers for In Vivo Imaging.Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2025Article
- Peptide-Based Biomaterials as a Promising Tool for Cancer Radiotherapy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- CD45-targeted PET enables the visualization of inflammatory conditions.American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As the smallest antibody fragment with specific binding affinity, nanobody-based nuclear medicine has demonstrated significant potential to revolutionize the field of precision medicine, supported by burgeoning preclinical investigations and accumulating clinical evidence. However, the visualization of nanobodies has also exposed their suboptimal biodistribution patterns, which has spurred collaborative efforts to refine their pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles for improved therapeutic efficacy. In this review, we present clinical results that exemplify the benefits of nanobody-based molecular imaging in cancer diagnosis. Moreover, we emphasize the indispensable role of molecular imaging as a tool for evaluating and optimizing nanobodies, thereby expanding their therapeutic potential in cancer treatment in the foreseeable future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39800806What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.