ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2025
Correlation analysis between preoperative odontoid incidence and clinical outcomes 2 years after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Impact of sarcopenia on postoperative clinical outcomes in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study presents a novel odontoid parameter, the odontoid incidence (OI), to examine the correlation between OI on preoperative cervical sagittal radiographs and 2-year clinical outcomes following short-segment anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM).
methodsA retrospective analysis of the clinical data of 87 patients with CSM who underwent ACDF surgery from January 2018 to December 2023 was conducted. The patients were categorized into a larger OI group (44 patients, OI > 12.62°) and a smaller OI group (43 patients, OI ≤ 12.62°) on the basis of the median cervical sagittal OI prior to surgery. The postoperative follow-up duration was 2 years. Cervical sagittal parameters were assessed on lateral cervical spine radiographs both preoperatively and postoperatively. Additionally, the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA), neck disability index (NDI), and visual analog scale (VAS) scores were documented for each patient before surgery and at the final 2-year postoperative follow-up.
resultsCompared with those in the preoperative period, the T1 slope, C2‒C7 Cobb angle, sagittal segmental angle (SSA), and C0‒C2 Cobb angle significantly improved in 87 patients with cervical spondylosis (P < 0.05). At the 2-year postoperative follow-up, all patients exhibited significant improvements in JOA, NDI, and VAS scores compared with the preoperative values (P < 0.05). No statistically significant difference was observed in the preoperative or baseline data between the larger OI group and the smaller OI group (P > 0.05); however, a statistically significant difference was noted in the postoperative SSA between the two groups (P < 0.05). A statistically significant difference was observed in the VAS score and NDI score at the final follow-up between the two groups (P < 0.05), as well as in the improvement in the JOA score and VAS score (preoperative score minus the final follow-up score), between the two groups (P < 0.05). The results of the Pearson correlation analysis indicated a negative correlation between the preoperative OI score and the VAS and NDI scores at the final postoperative follow-up (P = 0.012, r = - 0.268) (P = 0.028, r = - 0.236).
conclusionIn ACDF, the preoperative OI of patients with CSM was negatively correlated with the VAS and NDI scores at the final postoperative follow-up; Larger preoperative OI corresponded to lower VAS and NDI scores at the final follow-up, leading to comparatively improved 2-year clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.