ArticleJournal of oral & facial pain and headache2024
Various topical drug combination assessed using a neurosensory stent for chronic intraoral neuropathic pain: a pilot study.
Article in Journal of oral & facial pain and headache, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic intraoral neuropathic pain (NP), often developing post-dental procedures, poses significant management challenges. The prevalent use of systemic treatments, with their frequent substantial side effects, emphasizes the need for alternative therapeutic strategies. Our aim is to explore the efficacy and adherence with a topical drug regimen delivered through a neurosensory stent (NS) for treating chronic neuropathic pain (NP) within the oral cavity. A retrospective analysis in addition to a telephone structured questionnaire conducted on patients with chronic intraoral NP treated at the Orofacial Pain Clinic, Hadassah Medical Center, between 2017 and 2020. A standard combination of lidocaine 2%, pregabalin 5%, ibuprofen 5% and optionally amitriptyline 2% was administered using a custom-made NS. Out of 12 participants, 6 reported more than 50% pain relief, indicating high effectiveness. Notably, females showed a more favorable response than males. 75% of patients used the NS consistently. No significant difference in pain relief was observed between the standard formula and the one with supplementary amitriptyline. The results highlight the potential of NS as an alternative, or adjunct treatment that may reduce the dosage of systemic medications for chronic NP. Additionally, the NS device can be used as an "escape drug", or add-on, method if pain exacerbates under systemic therapy or if higher dose of systemic therapy causes serious side effects. Large scale prospective double-blind studies are required to substantiate the findings of this pilot study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.