SynthesisJournal of oral & facial pain and headache2024
Autonomic features of craniofacial neuralgias: a systematic review with meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of oral & facial pain and headache, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Implant-related orofacial pain managed with implant apicoectomy: A case report.Clinical advances in periodontics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of the study is to describe the severity, temporal characteristics, and types of autonomic features as they relate to the characteristics of pain of the neuralgias. Also, to describe, based on literature, how these autonomic features can affect the treatment outcomes of patients with craniofacial neuralgias. We carried out a literature search using five databases, PubMed, Embase, OVID, Scopus and Web of Science. The search was executed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). The protocol for this systematic review and meta-analysis was registered on PROSPERO CRD42021235319. 40% of all patients with craniofacial neuralgias had at least one autonomic feature. Out of the craniofacial neuralgias, trigeminal neuralgia was the most reported, with lacrimation being the most prevalent concomitant autonomic feature. There was also differences in the occurrence of the autonomic features dependent on which branch of a nerve such as the trigeminal nerve, was afflicted. When trigeminal neuralgia is excluded, the rest of the craniofacial neuralgias had reported autonomic features 28% of the pain events. (95% Confidence Interval: 2-90%). Contrary to the conventional belief, we found certain autonomic features to be more predominant than others, in specific craniofacial neuralgias. The prevalence of the autonomic features for all craniofacial neuralgias in the descending order is as follows, lacrimation, conjunctival injection, nasal congestion, rhinorrhea, flushing, edema/swelling, salivation, ptosis and sweating. With trigeminal neuralgia, the most common autonomic feature was lacrimation, and the least common was nasal congestion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.