Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39800434›Full record

ArticleOpen heart2025

Evaluation of three diagnostic algorithms to reduce normal scan rates, radiation exposure and costs in patients with suspected chronic coronary syndrome referred for 82Rb-Positron Emission Tomography (

Simon M Frey, Gabrielle Huré, Jan-Philipp Leibfarth, Kathrin Thommen, Melissa L Amrein, Ibrahim Schaefer, Klara Rumora, Igor G Schneider, Federico Caobelli, Damian Wild and 4 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Open heart, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Simon M FreyDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland simon.frey@usb.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6786-7931
Gabrielle HuréCardiovascular Research Institute Basel (CRIB), University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Jan-Philipp LeibfarthCardiovascular Research Institute Basel (CRIB), University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Kathrin ThommenDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Melissa L AmreinCardiovascular Research Institute Basel (CRIB), University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Ibrahim SchaeferCardiovascular Research Institute Basel (CRIB), University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Klara RumoraCardiovascular Research Institute Basel (CRIB), University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Igor G SchneiderDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Federico CaobelliNuclear Medicine, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.
Damian WildDivision of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Philip HaafDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Felix MahfoudDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Christian MüllerDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1120-6405
Michael J ZellwegerDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe majority of functional ischemia tests in patients with suspected chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) yield normal results. Implementing gatekeepers for patient preselection, such as pretest probability (PTP) and/or coronary artery calcium score (CACS), could reduce the number of normal scan results, radiation exposure and costs. However, the efficacy and safety of these approaches remain unclear.

methodsThree diagnostic algorithms based on PTP, as summarised in the 2019 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) CCS guidelines, were retrospectively applied to 1792 patients with suspected CCS referred for 82Rb-Positron Emission Tomography (

resultsThe mean age of the patients was 65±11 years, and 43% were female. PTP ≤5% and <15% were present in 7.5% and 41.0%, respectively. Algorithm 1 reduced scans, radiation and costs by 7.5% without significantly missing ischemia (sensitivity/negative predictive value (NPV) 98.6%/99.7%). Algorithm 2 showed the largest reduction (41.0%), but sensitivity was significantly reduced (80.2%). Algorithm 3 demonstrated optimal performance, reducing radiation by 17.0% and costs by 17.3% without significantly missing ischemia suggesting excellent safety (sensitivity/NPV 98.0%/99.5%).

conclusionUsing a diagnostic algorithm combining PTP and CACS (algorithm 3), the number of normal scan results, radiation exposure and costs could be significantly reduced without a significant increase in missed diagnoses suggesting similar outcome and excellent patients safety. Consequently, this approach could help to optimally allocate limited healthcare resources while maintaining patient's safety.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsPositron-Emission TomographyRadiation ExposureRadiopharmaceuticalsRubidium RadioisotopesAgedCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsRadiation DosageRetrospective StudiesRadiopharmaceuticalsRubidium-82Rubidium RadioisotopesCardiac Imaging TechniquesCORONARY ARTERY DISEASEMultidetector Computed TomographyPositron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography

Identifiers

PMID39800434
PMCPMC11751945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.