Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39800394›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Examining the effect of direct-from-blood bacterial testing on antibiotic administration and clinical outcomes: a protocol and statistical analysis plan for a pragmatic randomised trial.

David C Gaston, Romney M Humphries, Ariel A Lewis, Cheryl L Gatto, Li Wang, George E Nelson, Joanna L Stollings, Benjamin J Ereshefsky, Matthew A Christensen, Mary Lynn Dear and 6 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06069206 (Effect of Direct-from-blood Bacterial Testing on Antibiotic Administration and Clinical Outcomes), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06069206 nacompletednot on this map

Effect of Direct-from-blood Bacterial Testing on Antibiotic Administration and Clinical Outcomes: A Learning Healthcare Pragmatic Randomized Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorVanderbilt University Medical CenterRan2023 to 2025Enrolled500ConditionsBloodstream Infection, Sepsis Bacterial, MRSA Bacteremia, VancomycinArmsT2Bacteria® Panel (direct-from-blood testing), Usual Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Effect of Direct-from-blood Bacterial Testing on Antibiotics Administration in Adults Presenting With Acute Infection: A Randomized Trial.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

David C GastonDepartment of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA david.c.gaston@vumc.org.
Romney M HumphriesDepartment of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Ariel A LewisVanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-9555-6337
Cheryl L GattoVanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Li WangDepartment of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
George E NelsonDepartment of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Joanna L StollingsDepartment of Pharmaceutical Services, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Benjamin J EreshefskyDepartment of Pharmaceutical Services, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Matthew A ChristensenDepartment of Medicine, Division of Allergy, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Mary Lynn DearVanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Ritu BanerjeeDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Karen F MillerVanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Wesley H SelfVanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Matthew W Semler *Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7664-8263
Edward T Qian *Department of Medicine, Division of Allergy, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1092-3533
Vanderbilt Center for Learning Healthcare

Funding

Interdisciplinary Training in Injury and Critical IllnessT32GM135094 · NIGMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI PATEL, MAYUR B · 2021 to 2025
$967k
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM135094
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPatients with suspected bacterial infection frequently receive empiric, broad-spectrum antibiotics prior to pathogen identification due to the time required for bacteria to grow in culture. Direct-from-blood diagnostics identifying the presence or absence of bacteria and/or resistance genes from whole blood samples within hours of collection could enable earlier antibiotic optimisation for patients suspected to have bacterial infections. However, few randomised trials have evaluated the effect of using direct-from-blood bacterial testing on antibiotic administration and clinical outcomes. This manuscript describes the protocol and statistical analysis plan for a randomised trial designed to evaluate the effect of blood cultures plus direct-from-blood bacterial testing results compared with blood culture results alone on antibiotic administration and clinical outcomes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We are conducting a prospective, single-centre, parallel-group, non-blinded, pragmatic, randomised trial. The trial will enrol 500 adult patients presenting to the emergency department at Vanderbilt University Medical Center with suspected bacterial infection who have been initiated on empiric intravenous vancomycin. Eligible patients are randomised 1:1 to receive Food and Drug Administration-approved direct-from-blood bacterial testing in addition to blood cultures or blood cultures alone. The primary outcome is the time to the last dose of intravenous vancomycin within 14 days of randomisation. The secondary outcome is the time to the last dose of systemic antipseudomonal beta-lactam antibiotics within 14 days of randomisation. Additional outcomes include highest stage of acute kidney injury, lowest platelet count and receipt of kidney replacement therapy within 14 days of randomisation, as well as hospital-free days, intensive care unit-free-days and all-cause, in-hospital mortality within 28 days of randomisation. Enrolment began on 13 December 2023. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The trial involves human participants and was approved by the Vanderbilt University Medical Center institutional review board with a waiver of informed consent (IRB#231229). Results will be submitted in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at scientific conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06069206.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial InfectionsBlood CultureVancomycinHumansPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeAnti-Bacterial AgentsVancomycinAnti-Bacterial AgentsMolecular diagnosticsRandomized Controlled Trial

Identifiers

PMID39800394
PMCPMC11751835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.