Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39800386›Full record

SynthesisBMJ global health2025

Evolution and effectiveness of bilateral and multilateral development assistance for health: a mixed-methods review of trends and strategic shifts (1990-2022).

Siwei Xie, Sijin Du, Yuxin Huang, Yan Luo, Ying Chen, Zhijie Zheng, Beibei Yuan, Ming Xu, Shuduo Zhou

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Siwei Xie *Department of Biostatistics, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-1602-2296
Sijin Du *Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Yuxin HuangDepartment of Global Health, Peking University School of Public Health, Beijing, China.
Yan LuoCapital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Ying ChenDepartment of Global Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Zhijie ZhengDepartment of Global Health, Peking University School of Public Health, Beijing, China.
Beibei YuanPeking University, Beijing, China zhoushuduo@pku.edu.cn xum2022@pku.edu.cn beibeiyuan@pku.edu.cn.
Ming XuDepartment of Global Health, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China zhoushuduo@pku.edu.cn xum2022@pku.edu.cn beibeiyuan@pku.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4600-8644
Shuduo ZhouDepartment of Biostatistics, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China zhoushuduo@pku.edu.cn xum2022@pku.edu.cn beibeiyuan@pku.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5463-3116

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDevelopment assistance for health (DAH) plays a vital role in supporting health programmes in low- and middle-income countries. While DAH has historically focused on infectious diseases and maternal and child health, there is a lack of comprehensive analysis of DAH trends, strategic shifts and their impact on health systems and outcomes. This study aims to provide a comprehensive review of DAH from 1990 to 2022, examining its evolution and funding allocation shifts.

methodsWe conducted a mixed-methods review, adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A systematic literature search was performed across PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane databases, yielding 102 eligible studies. Quantitative data were obtained from the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation database, covering DAH data from 1990 to 2022. Qualitative data were analysed through thematic synthesis based on the WHO's six health system building blocks.

resultsThe DAH has predominantly focused on HIV/AIDS and maternal and child health. Despite the increasing global burden of non-communicable diseases (NCDs), the proportion of DAH allocated to NCDs remained low, increasing only from 1% in 1990 to 2% in 2022. Similarly, the overall funding for health system strengthening decreased from 19% in 1990 to 7% in 2022. Major contributors to DAH included the USA, the UK and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. While associations between DAH and improvements in certain health outcomes were observed, establishing causality is challenging due to multiple influencing factors. The COVID-19 pandemic underscored the importance of robust health systems. However, DAH allocation did not show any substantial shift towards health system strengthening during this period. Economic evaluations calculated the median incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of DAH interventions,

conclusionsThis study reviews DAH trends from 1990 to 2022, showing a predominant focus on HIV/AIDS and maternal and child health, with insufficient attention to NCDs and health system strengthening. Despite the increasing burden of NCDs and the impact of COVID-19, DAH priorities have not significantly shifted, highlighting the need for ongoing evaluation and strategic adjustments. To enhance DAH effectiveness, it is crucial to adopt a more balanced approach and also align interventions with needs from recipient countries and implement evidence-based strategies with continuous monitoring and evaluation.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareGlobal HealthInternational CooperationCOVID-19Developing CountriesHumansGlobal HealthPublic Health

Identifiers

PMID39800386
PMCPMC11748945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.