Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39800376›Full record

ArticleJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2025

Hyperleukocytosis in a neuroblastoma patient after treatment with natural killer T cells expressing a GD2-specific chimeric antigen receptor and IL-15.

Gengwen Tian, Amy N Courtney, Hangjin Yu, Saleh Bhar, Xin Xu, Gabriel A Barragán, Claudia Martinez Amador, Nisha Ghatwai, Michael S Wood, Deborah Schady and 9 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03294954 (GD2 Specific Chimeric Antigen Receptor), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03294954 phase1recruitingnot on this map

GD2 Specific Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) and Interleukin-15 Expressing Autologous Natural Killer T-cells to Treat Children With Neuroblastoma

TypeinterventionalSponsorBaylor College of MedicineRan2018 to 2040Enrolled70ConditionsNeuroblastomaArmsGINAKIT Cells, GINAKIT cells + Etanercept
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. CD4Nature medicine · 2026
    Article
  7. Innate immune cells in chimeric antigen receptor therapy.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Facts and Hopes of Chimeric Antigen Receptor-Redirected NK T Cells.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Modulating TNFα Activity to Address Cytokine Related Toxicity.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Gengwen TianCenter for Advanced Innate Cell Therapy, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Amy N CourtneyCenter for Advanced Innate Cell Therapy, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Hangjin YuCenter for Advanced Innate Cell Therapy, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Saleh BharCenter for Cell and Gene Therapy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Xin XuCenter for Advanced Innate Cell Therapy, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9485-8782
Gabriel A BarragánCenter for Advanced Innate Cell Therapy, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Claudia Martinez AmadorCenter for Advanced Innate Cell Therapy, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Nisha GhatwaiCenter for Advanced Innate Cell Therapy, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Michael S WoodCenter for Advanced Innate Cell Therapy, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Deborah SchadyDepartment of Pathology and Immunology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Antonino MontalbanoCenter for Advanced Innate Cell Therapy, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Shantan ReddyDepartment of Microbiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Aoife M RocheDepartment of Microbiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
David de la CerdaCenter for Advanced Innate Cell Therapy, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Donald Williams ParsonsDepartment of Pediatrics-Hematology & Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Erica J Di PierroCenter for Advanced Innate Cell Therapy, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Frederic D BushmanDepartment of Microbiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Andras HeczeyCenter for Advanced Innate Cell Therapy, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Leonid S MetelitsaCenter for Advanced Innate Cell Therapy, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA lsmeteli@txch.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability of immune cells to expand numerically after infusion distinguishes adoptive immunotherapies from traditional drugs, providing unique therapeutic advantages as well as the potential for unmanageable toxicities. Here, we describe a case of lethal hyperleukocytosis in a patient with neuroblastoma treated on phase 1 clinical trial (NCT03294954) with autologous natural killer T cells (NKTs) expressing a GD2-specific chimeric antigen receptor and cytokine interleukin 15 (GD2-CAR.15). This patient was the first to be treated on dose level (DL) 5 and the first patient whose product was restimulated with K562-derived artificial antigen-presenting cells (aAPCs) instead of autologous peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). 12 previously treated patients on DLs 1 through 4 did not experience significant toxicity. Our root-cause analysis revealed no genetic alterations of known clinical significance and excluded the possibility of clonal expansion due to insertional retroviral mutagenesis. We report that the use of aAPCs instead of PBMCs for CAR-NKT restimulation contributed to a hyperproliferative state associated with distinct gene expression that possibly led to explosive lymphocyte expansion and uncontrolled toxicity in the patient. These findings warrant the implementation of measures to control immune cell activation during manufacture of cell therapy products, especially those armed with transgenic cytokines.

Indexed as

Immunotherapy, AdoptiveInterleukin-15NeuroblastomaReceptors, Chimeric AntigenClinical Trials, Phase I as TopicGangliosidesHumansNatural Killer T-Cellsganglioside, GD2GangliosidesIL15 protein, humanInterleukin-15Receptors, Chimeric AntigenAdoptive cell therapy - ACTChimeric antigen receptor - CARNeuroblastoma

Identifiers

PMID39800376
PMCPMC11883886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.