ArticleInternational wound journal2025
Comparison of cell-scaffold interactions in a biological and a synthetic wound matrix.
Article in International wound journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Article
- Comparison of cell-scaffold interactions in a biological and a synthetic wound matrix.International wound journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wound healing is a central physiological process that restores the barrier properties of the skin after injury, comprising close coordination between several cell types (including fibroblasts and macrophages) in the wound bed. The complex mechanisms involved are executed and regulated by an equally complex, reciprocal signalling network involving numerous signalling molecules such as catabolic and anabolic inflammatory mediators (e.g., cytokines, chemokines). In chronic wound environments, the balance in the molecular signatures of inflammatory mediators is usually impaired. Thus, we compared the ability of a collagen-based wound matrix against a synthetic wound matrix to attract fibroblasts and macrophages that deliver these signalling molecules. In particular, the balance between pro- and anti- inflammatory cytokine secretion was assessed. We found that the natural collagen-based matrix was the most efficient adhesive substrate to recruit and activate fibroblasts and macrophages on its surface. These cells secreted a variety of cytokines, and the natural biomaterial exhibited a more balanced secretion of pro- and anti-inflammatory mediators than the synthetic comparator. Thus, our study highlights the ability of native collagen matrices to modulate inflammatory mediator signatures in the wound bed, indicating that such devices may be beneficial for wound healing in the clinical setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.