Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39800360›Full record

ArticleChild: care, health and development2025

Early Years Practitioners' and Public Health Consultants' Perspectives on the Use of Interactive Electronic Devices in Young Children: A Qualitative Study.

Liane B Azevedo, Megan Downes, Sara Eastburn, Jane Covell, Paul Bissell

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Child: care, health and development, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07373483 (Interactive Electronic Devices), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07373483 recruitingnot on this map

Interactive Electronic Devices (IEDs) in the Home: Exploring How Young Children Use IEDs in the Family Home Setting

TypeobservationalSponsorSheffield Hallam UniversityRan2025 to 2026Enrolled20ConditionsThis Study Explores How Young Children Aged 3 to 5 Use Interactive Electronic Devices
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Liane B AzevedoCollege of Health, Wellbeing and Life Sciences, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9966-9414
Megan DownesSchool of Human and Health Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1995-9448
Sara EastburnDepartment of Allied Health Professions, School of Human and Health Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1242-4030
Jane CovellKirklees Council, Huddersfield, UK.
Paul BissellUniversity of Chester, Chester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6503-6205

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInteractive electronic devices (IEDs) are ubiquitous in young children's lives. However, research on their impact on learning and development is still limited. The aim of this study was to understand the perspectives of early years practitioners (EYPs) and public health consultants (PHCs) on the use of IEDs in children aged 3-5.

methodsUsing purposive sampling techniques, we recruited four EYPs and two PHCs from children's nurseries and a government organisation in the northwest of England. Semi-structured interviews were used to collect data, which were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and anonymised. Data were analysed using reflective thematic analysis.

resultsEYPs and PHCs noted that although IEDs could negatively impact child development and behaviour, they could also aid in learning. EYPs expressed concerns about the impact of parents' own IED habits on children's communication and social skills. On the other hand, PHCs stressed that substituting outdoor play with the use of these devices could affect children's social and physical skills and reduce physical activity levels, which are crucial for development. Finally, both EYPs and PHCs agreed that there was a need to improve parents' and EYP's knowledge and to develop interactive interventions to promote an understanding of how IEDs should be used with young children.

conclusionEYPs and PHCs acknowledge the potential advantages of using IEDs as a teaching tool for children. However, they have concerns about the long-term effects on communication, social and physical skills and how children are impacted by their parents' use of these devices. To support policy statements, future research should offer further evidence of the benefits and harms of IED use.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelChild DevelopmentChild, PreschoolConsultantsEnglandFemaleHumansMaleParentsPublic HealthQualitative Researchmobile phonesnurserytabletsthematic analysisyoung children

Identifiers

PMID39800360
PMCPMC11725388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.