Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39800236›Full record

Trial reportChest2025

Low-Dose Melatonin for Prevention of Delirium in Critically Ill Patients: A Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Feasibility Trial.

Lisa D Burry, David R Williamson, Michael E Detsky, Francis Bernard, Jennifer Foster, Sangeeta Mehta, Ruxandra Pinto, Damon C Scales, Louise Rose

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Chest, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02615340 (Feasibility of Melatonin for Prevention of Delirium in Critically Ill Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02615340 phase2unknown statusnot on this map

Feasibility of Melatonin for Prevention of Delirium in Critically Ill Patients: a Multi-centre, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Study.

TypeinterventionalSponsorMount Sinai Hospital, CanadaRan2017 to 2019Enrolled69ConditionsDeliriumArmsMelatonin, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lisa D BurryDepartment of Pharmacy, Sinai Health, Toronto, ON, Canada; Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. Electronic address: lisa.burry@sinaihealth.ca.
David R WilliamsonFaculté de Pharmacie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada; Pharmacy Département, Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal, University of Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada; Research Center, CIUSSS du Nord-de-l'Île-de-Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Michael E DetskyDepartment of Medicine, Sinai Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Francis BernardDépartement de Médecine, Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal, University of Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Jennifer FosterDepartment of Critical Care, IWK Health and Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Sangeeta MehtaInterdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Ruxandra PintoDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Damon C ScalesInterdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; ICES, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Critical Care Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Louise RoseFlorence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, London, England.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDelirium is a common and serious syndrome of acute brain dysfunction associated with negative outcomes. Melatonin may have a role in delirium prevention for critically ill adults based on data from noncritically ill patient populations. Our objective was to assess the feasibility of a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial testing the hypothesis that low-dose melatonin prevents delirium in adults who are critically ill. RESEARCH QUESTION: Does low-dose melatonin prevent delirium in critically ill adults? STUDY DESIGN AND

methodsWe conducted this 3-arm feasibility trial in 3 tertiary academic ICUs. Included participants were ≥ 18 years of age, confirmed free of delirium at enrollment, and anticipated to require a > 48-hour ICU stay. We randomized participants to nightly melatonin 0.5 mg, 2 mg, or placebo. Feasibility outcomes were protocol adherence and recruitment rates. Our primary feasibility target was ≥ 85% (± 5% margin of error) of drug doses administered as per protocol. Secondary objectives were to explore adverse drug effects, melatonin pharmacokinetics, and clinical outcomes.

resultsWe screened 2,259 patients and excluded 1,863 patients (82.5%), resulting in 396 eligible patients, of whom 71 provided consent, for a recruitment rate of 0.8 patients/mo/site. Median age was 60.5 years (interquartile range [IQR], 48-67 years), and median admission Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score was 7 (IQR, 3-10). Percentage drug administration protocol adherence per patient was a median of 100% (IQR, 92.3%-100%) or a mean of 88.7% (SD, 24.4%). Twenty-five protocol violations occurred, with no differences between groups. Fourteen patients (20%) experienced delirium during the study period and 25 patients (36%) experienced subsyndromal delirium, with no differences between study groups. No serious adverse effects were detected.

interpretationOur trial protocol comparing 2 low doses of melatonin and placebo for delirium prevention in critically ill adults demonstrated feasibility for protocol adherence. However, trial eligibility rates were modest primarily because of delirium being present or the inability to screen. Consent rates also were low. This finding suggests that conducting delirium prevention trials that require delirium to be absent on enrollment is particularly challenging in the ICU. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT02615340; URL: www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessDeliriumMelatoninAgedDose-Response Relationship, DrugFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedMelatonindeliriumfeasibilityintensive caremelatoninpreventionrandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID39800236
PMCPMC12106956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.