ArticleThe Journal of small animal practice2025
Perioperative analgesic effects of a modified supratemporal retrobulbar block in dogs undergoing corneal and endocular surgery.
Article in The Journal of small animal practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate the perioperative efficacy of a modified supratemporal retrobulbar block in dogs undergoing ocular surgery. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this prospective randomised clinical trial, dogs were premedicated with dexmedetomidine (1 mcg/kg im) and methadone (0.1 mg/kg im), induced with propofol to effect and maintained with isoflurane (FE'Iso 1.1%). In the retrobulbar group a mixture of lidocaine 2% (5.5 mL) and ropivacaine 0.75% (2 mL) was administered at 0.1 mL/kg, via a modified supratemporal technique using a Tuohy needle. No block was performed in the controls. When heart rate or mean arterial pressure increased above 30% of the pre-incisional values, fentanyl (1 mcg/kg iv) was administered. Propofol (1 mg/kg iv) was injected when anaesthesia was deemed too light. After a total of three administrations regardless of the type of drugs (fentanyl/propofol), a constant rate infusion of fentanyl (5 mcg/kg/h iv) was started. Quality of recovery (blindly assessed using a descriptive score scale), postoperative eye rubbing and complications were studied.
resultsEighteen dogs were included. The retrobulbar group (nine) dogs had significantly less risk of receiving fentanyl than controls (nine) (Relative risk: 0.142, 95% CI: 0.021 to 0.936) and a recovery score > 2 (RR: 0.058, 95% CI: 0.003 to 0.887). The median amount of fentanyl (mcg/kg) was statistically lower in the retrobulbar group than in the controls: 0 mcg/kg (range, 0 to 1) versus 2 mcg/kg (range, 0 to 8.49), respectively. Only controls showed eye rubbing. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The modified supratemporal retrobulbar block reduced the intraoperative rescue analgesia and improved the quality of recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.