Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39799961›Full record

ArticleBrain : a journal of neurology2025

Visual feature processing in a large stroke cohort: evidence against modular organization.

Selma Lugtmeijer, Aleksandra M Sobolewska, Edward H F de Haan, H Steven Scholte

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Brain : a journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Mapping macaque to human cortex with natural scene responses.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Beyond binding: from modular to natural vision.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Selma LugtmeijerCentre for Human Brain Health and Institute for Mental Health, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
Aleksandra M SobolewskaDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Centre, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Edward H F de HaanDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Centre, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0312-3674
H Steven ScholteFaculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, University of Amsterdam, 1001 NK Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

ERC Advanced #339374
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mid-level visual processing represents a crucial stage between basic sensory input and higher-level object recognition. The conventional model posits that fundamental visual qualities, such as colour and motion, are processed in specialized, retinotopic brain regions (e.g. V4 for colour, MT/V5 for motion). Using atlas-based lesion-symptom mapping and disconnectome maps in a cohort of 307 ischaemic stroke patients, we examined the neuroanatomical correlates underlying the processing of eight mid-level visual qualities. Contrary to the predictions of the standard model, our results did not reveal consistent relationships between processing impairments and damage to traditionally associated brain regions. Although we validated our methodology by confirming the established relationship between visual field defects and damage to primary visual areas (V1, V2 and V3), we found no reliable evidence linking processing deficits to specific regions in the posterior brain. These findings challenge the traditional modular view of visual processing and suggest that mid-level visual processing might be more distributed across neural networks than previously thought. This supports alternative models where visual maps represent constellations of co-occurring information rather than specific qualities.

Indexed as

StrokeAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedModels, NeurologicalNeuroimagingYoung Adulthalf-field defectsretinotopic mapsstrokesymptom–lesion mappingvision

Identifiers

PMID39799961
PMCPMC11969467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.