ArticlePsychiatry research2025
Gaps in psychiatric care before and after the COVID-19 pandemic among patients with depression using electronic health records.
Article in Psychiatry research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mental Health Specialist Telemedicine Uptake and Patient Location.JAMA network open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic caused disruption to health services. It is unclear if there were inequalities in the continuity of mental health care in the years around the COVID-19 pandemic. We used electronic health records (EHR) to detect mental health care gaps of more than six months in psychiatric appointments across demographic and socioeconomic characteristics among patients with depression. The analysis included patients with depression who were seen at one of two mental health clinics every year of 2018, 2019, 2021, and 2022 (n = 783 patients). First, we found that the odds of mental health care gaps significantly decreased in the post-pandemic period (2021-2022) relative to the pre-pandemic period (2018-2019). Second, in the pre-pandemic period, patients who lived in areas in the highest tertile of deprivation had greater odds of gaps in mental health care relative to those in the lowest tertile (aOR: 2.18 [95 % CI: 1.02, 4.68]). Males had higher odds of gaps in care than females in the post-pandemic period (aOR: 2.22 [1.13, 4.37]) and the pooled pre- and post-pandemic study period (aOR: 1.58 [1.04, 2.40]). Third, interactions between patient characteristics and time were not significant, suggesting that the change in the odds of gaps of mental health care before relative to after the COVID-19 pandemic did not differ significantly based on patient characteristics. Overall, gaps in care decreased in the post-pandemic period relative to the pre-pandemic period among almost all patient groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.