ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2025
A novel MRI-based radiomics for preoperative prediction of lymphovascular invasion in rectal cancer.
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Preoperative prediction of KRAS mutation in rectal cancer using a combined T2-weighted imaging radiomics and volumetric apparent diffusion coefficient histogram model.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Deep learning model based on MRI-derived microvascular network simulation parameters for noninvasive assessment of lymphovascular invasion in rectal cancer patients.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
- Microstructural mapping of time-dependent diffusion MRI for predicting lymphovascular invasion in rectal cancer: a proof-of-concept investigation.Insights into imaging · 2026Article
- Interpretable MRI Subregional Radiomics-Deep Learning Model for Preoperative Lymphovascular Invasion Prediction in Rectal Cancer: A Dual-Center Study.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Research Progress of MRI-based Radiomics in Rectal CancerCurrent medical imaging · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo develop and validate a clinical-radiomics model for preoperative prediction of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) in rectal cancer.
methodsThis retrospective study included data from 239 patients with pathologically confirmed rectal adenocarcinoma from two centers, all of whom underwent MRI examinations. Cases from the first center (n = 189) were randomly divided into a training set and an internal validation set at a 7:3 ratio, while cases from the second center (n = 50) constituted the external validation set. The clinical features and MRI imaging characteristics of the patients in the training set were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify independent risk factors for LVI in rectal cancer, and these risk factors were then used to construct a clinical model. Regions of interest (ROIs) were delineated on T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequences for feature extraction. After feature reduction and selection, the most strongly correlated features were identified, and their respective regression coefficients were calculated to construct the radiomics model. Finally, a combined clinical-radiomics model was built using a weighted linear combination of features and was visualized as a nomogram. The predictive performance of each model was quantified using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves and the area under the curve (AUC) in both training and validation sets, with DeLong analysis being used to compare model performance. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to evaluate the clinical utility of each model in the validation sets.
resultsIn the 239 patients, the combined model outperformed the clinical and radiomics models in predicting LVI in rectal cancer. The combined model showed excellent predictive performance in the training, internal validation, and external validation sets, with AUCs of 0.90 (0.88-0.97), 0.88 (0.78-0.99), and 0.88 (0.78-0.95), respectively. The sensitivity values were 75.9%, 68.8%, and 80.0%, respectively, and the specificity values were 90.3%, 92.7%, and 88.6%. DCA results indicated that the nomogram of the combined model had superior clinical utility compared with the clinical and radiomics models.
conclusionsThe clinical-radiomics nomogram serves as a valuable tool for non-invasive preoperative prediction of LVI status in patients with rectal cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39799548What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.