ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Institute2025
Making the case for an International Childhood Cancer Data Partnership.
Article in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The burden of childhood cancers in the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) Region: a population-based, cross-sectional GLOBOCAN 2022 analysis.The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia · 2026Article
- Performance of adult-trained artificial intelligence models in paediatric imaging-a scoping review.European radiology · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: A Comprehensive Cross-Cancer Translational Readiness Analysis Across 18 Malignancies.Cancers · 2026Review
- Clinical Characteristics, Diagnosis, and Management of Primary Malignant Lung Tumors in Children: A Single-Center Analysis.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Childhood cancers are a heterogeneous group of rare diseases, accounting for less than 2% of all cancers diagnosed worldwide. Most countries, therefore, do not have enough cases to provide robust information on epidemiology, treatment, and late effects, especially for rarer types of cancer. Thus, only through a concerted effort to share data internationally will we be able to answer research questions that could not otherwise be answered. With this goal in mind, the US National Cancer Institute and the French National Cancer Institute co-sponsored the Paris Conference for an International Childhood Cancer Data Partnership in November 2023. This meeting convened more than 200 participants from 17 countries to address complex challenges in pediatric cancer research and data sharing. This Commentary delves into some key topics discussed during the Paris Conference and describes pilots that will help move this international effort forward. Main topics presented include: (1) the wide variation in interpreting the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation among Member States; (2) obstacles with transferring personal health data outside of the European Union; (3) standardization and harmonization, including common data models; and (4) novel approaches to data sharing such as federated querying and federated learning. We finally provide a brief description of 3 ongoing pilot projects. The International Childhood Cancer Data Partnership is the first step in developing a process to better support pediatric cancer research internationally through combining data from multiple countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.