ArticleBMC bioinformatics2025
UniAMP: enhancing AMP prediction using deep neural networks with inferred information of peptides.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nano-antimicrobial peptides (Nano-AMPs) to combat resistant gram-negative bacteria.Drug delivery and translational research · 2026Review
- SGAC: a graph neural network framework for imbalanced and structure-aware AMP classification.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- IntelligentFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Harnessing Machine Learning Approaches for the Identification, Characterization, and Optimization of Novel Antimicrobial Peptides.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Unveiling the Bioactive Potential of the Invasive JellyfishBiomolecules · 2025Article
- ConsAMPHemo: A computational framework for predicting hemolysis of antimicrobial peptides based on machine learning approaches.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) have been widely recognized as a promising solution to combat antimicrobial resistance of microorganisms due to the increasing abuse of antibiotics in medicine and agriculture around the globe. In this study, we propose UniAMP, a systematic prediction framework for discovering AMPs. We observe that feature vectors used in various existing studies constructed from peptide information, such as sequence, composition, and structure, can be augmented and even replaced by information inferred by deep learning models. Specifically, we use a feature vector with 2924 values inferred by two deep learning models, UniRep and ProtT5, to demonstrate that such inferred information of peptides suffice for the task, with the help of our proposed deep neural network model composed of fully connected layers and transformer encoders for predicting the antibacterial activity of peptides. Evaluation results demonstrate superior performance of our proposed model on both balanced benchmark datasets and imbalanced test datasets compared with existing studies. Subsequently, we analyze the relations among peptide sequences, manually extracted features, and automatically inferred information by deep learning models, leading to observations that the inferred information is more comprehensive and non-redundant for the task of predicting AMPs. Moreover, this approach alleviates the impact of the scarcity of positive data and demonstrates great potential in future research and applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.