ReviewActa neuropathologica communications2025
Personalising glioblastoma medicine: explant organoid applications, challenges and future perspectives.
Review in Acta neuropathologica communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Flash Assembloids: A Rapid Biofabrication of a Platform for Modeling Early Glioblastoma Invasion at the Glioblastoma-Brain Organoid Interfaces.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Article
- Construction Strategies, Microenvironmental Modelling and Precision-Therapy Applications of Glioma Organoid Models.Cancers · 2026Review
- From patient to tumor organoid: Culture protocol choice controls glioblastoma tumor architecture and identity.Brain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Cryopreservation of brain organoids - a tool for on-demand organoid banking.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Integrated 2D-3D Proteomic Profiling Identifies MLK4 as a Microenvironment-Responsive Regulator of Chemotherapeutic Resistance in Human Glioblastoma Cells.Biology of the cell · 2026Article
- Review
- Review
- Informing development of brain cancer therapies within "preclinical trials" using ex vivo patient tumors.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2026Review
- Review
- Review
- From gut to liver: organoids as platforms for next-generation toxicology assessment vehicles for xenobiotics.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Review
- Mapping TAM-tumor crosstalk in glioma via ligand-receptor multi-omics: mechanisms of immune evasion.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) is a highly aggressive adult brain cancer, characterised by poor prognosis and a dismal five-year survival rate. Despite significant knowledge gains in tumour biology, meaningful advances in patient survival remain elusive. The field of neuro-oncology faces many disease obstacles, one being the paucity of faithful models to advance preclinical research and guide personalised medicine approaches. Recent technological developments have permitted the maintenance, expansion and cryopreservation of GBM explant organoid (GBO) tissue. GBOs represent a translational leap forward and are currently the state-of-the-art in 3D in vitro culture system, retaining brain cancer heterogeneity, and transiently maintaining the immune infiltrate and tumour microenvironment (TME). Here, we provide a review of existing brain cancer organoid technologies, in vivo xenograft approaches, evaluate in-detail the key advantages and limitations of this rapidly emerging technology, and consider solutions to overcome these difficulties. GBOs currently hold significant promise, with the potential to emerge as the key translational tool to synergise and enhance next-generation omics efforts and guide personalised medicine approaches for brain cancer patients into the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.